aokiji

This is a political purge.

There is an ongoing lawsuit of the State of Texas against the swing-states where massive fraud occurred. Almost 20 states have joined the lawsuit initiated by Texas.

This is being censored by Google, Twitter and the usual Global Reset pawns.

They send 15 officers to a Nascar driver's place because he decided to make a publicity stunt and say that a regular garage door noose was a hanging rope placed to scare him because of his skin color.

Enough is enough. This could be my or anyone else's children. Disband the FBI. Prosecute them. Treason.

Twitter is just an extreme example of a social media platform acting like a publisher and applying blatant censorship.

########## Significance

COVID-19 total “deaths” in the U.S. are at 168,864.

So 6% is only 10,131 deaths from COVID-19 with no other underlying causes.

The New York Times put out an extensive article on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and how they determine who has COVID-19 or not. The PCR tests are widely used to search for small segments of genetic material that look like COVID-19. If it finds it, the test is positive.

The sensitivity levels of the PCR tests have been set too high. The New York Times reports that up to 90% of people testing “positive” carried barely any virus.

People may have had COVID-19 a while ago but certainly didn’t have it now. Or the test may have detected some naturally occurring genetic segments that looked like COVID-19 but weren’t.

Context: if the medical community set appropriate sensitivity levels resulting in “real” positives for COVID-19, the COVID-19-related genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be anywhere between 100-fold to 1,000-fold the levels that are being used today.

The states and the hospital systems use the PCR data when claiming a COVID-19-related death. If the PCR data comes back and says “positive,” then COVID-19 is claimed as a comorbidity. And we now know that up to 90% of those “positive” tests may in fact be “negative.”

The charts used so widely in by the media to scare us with the spikes in new COVID-19 cases… mean nothing at all.

More than half and up to 90% of those “new cases” are nothing at all. The economic lockdowns were for nothing. The two-week self-quarantines were for no reason at all.

Someone or some group within the CDC intentionally gave guidance for the PCR sensitivity settings knowing that this would result in an incredible spike in new cases… and economic destruction, fear, panic, and chaos.

This is a scandal of epic proportions.

Soft-censorship and derailing is done on purpose to censor certain topics which go against the establishment status quo. Reddit is fertile with such examples. If someone is making a comment which does not bode well to those in power, it is common for the thread to be sunken with low-class behavior and baits in order to shut down valid discussion by forcing an emergence of rule-breaking content.

That is a far more greater threat.

How do you propose to mitigate that?

An overreaching organization without a face for accountability is prone to disaster, as recent decades have shown. As a curiosity, the United Nations have had a former Nazi at its head. This situation was only rectified thanks to the United States.

https://unbrigandage.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/nazi-at-the-un...

And by the way, are you familiar with the writings of Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, Practical Idealism ?

http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical...

EDIT: care to explain the downvotes?

charlesism, you are blatantly promoting an agenda of censorship. One should not behave well due to the threat of punishment but by virtue of virtue.

You appear to stand against everything of value in the West. There are corporations and special interest groups trying to influence the narrative in reddit and even here in order to further reduce online freedoms and to establish the official list of forbidden thoughts.

Furthermore, The Atlantic has a long number of articles promoting globalism and the destruction of nation-states. A true free market of ideas requires anonymity. Who is going to help you when rampant corruption emerges in organizations such as the United Nations (a known harbor for individuals involved in child traffic scandals)? Remember the gamergate fiasco?

People all over the world are angry, and it is not their fault entirely - overpopulation and resource depletion need to be dealt with. But why doesn't anyone seem care about raising the bar on education, not just in terms of skill sets but also morality and long-term thinking?