antupis

it is fine the first 6 months then bore out hits and you will be miserable.

I think it is more nuanced, you can also change the organization bottom up, but it needs to be new stuff that does not exist or has it infancy. Changing existing stuff is very hard even top-down.

yup, I hope we get awsome open source-related content now.

It is not that much about censorship, even that would be somewhat fine if OpenAI would do it dataset level so chatgpt would not have any knowledge about bomb-making. But it is happening lazily so system prompts get bigger which makes a signal to noise worse etc. I don't care about racial bias or what to call pope when I want chatgpt to write Python code.

And it still changing pretty rapidly https://highcoastkvarken.org/our-joint-world-heritage/the-la...

Radiolab has the kinda same problem that Star Wars has. It is so influential that groundbreaking stuff has become an industrial standard so now the product kinda feels stale.

Yup, it is not perfect but I will take dbt every day against the old way as some random DDL files in git.

Testing and monitoring in every aspect are the only things that are greatly lacking, you always need to glue something together to get nice tests or some kind of data contract monitoring.

yup same here, I think subscribing 'works' but Google just botched the launch.

Methane stays only 12 years in the atmosphere versus CO2 which stays 300 to 1,000 years.

Yup pretty much this but you need to grind that $0/day work that you see right problems.

both had slump but I think Facebook has been much better shape after Zuck did layoffs and pivoted away from metaverse. Llama and Meta Smart Glasses both feel like groundbreaking products.

I think there are two ways. The first is basically what good sports teams do (or Netflix at least was doing) where you continuously fire people who don't perform wanted at levels but also do very rigorous hiring and pay very well. Then there is cut fast and deep and shuffle organization at the same time which also works if you do that when needed and very rarely like once in 10-15 years Facebook might have pulled this and the company looks like it is in much better shape than Google or Amazon.

you can also make games with Scratch eg https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/888899999/ . Another option is Replit that also has plenty of games ready https://replit.com/community/games

It is fraud when you don't tell that openly and pad books by it, but it is an okay tactic as a hedging risk as long as you are open about it.

There is unfollow button which works very well and changes your experience somewhat. Of course it does not matter that much because most LinkedIn content is rather bad.

Also depending on country there is tax and social security payments which companies dont have pay when they are buying consulting.

Chatgpt3.5 is good enought if can give context in query.

Usually when you are starting an actual new project that kinda throwaway is a very good way to understand business needs and problem domain.

Also, it is much slower than just shipping the code. I prefer working with a pair or a team but sometimes you need to ship often and fast.

I think it is speculation if you invite large-scale speculation then you hit some unexpected consciences. Just look at housing or cryptocurrencies.

If I am on vacation or in some other relaxed environment, I will go into a state where I sleep 6 hours at night but also take a siesta or 15-minute to 30-minute nap in the middle of the day.

Or they are super into weeds polishing stuff in code level but it is never between those two approaches. Also very good pm can be kinda shackled if there is lots of mediocre pms running around.

You can always use peat.

“release it fast and patch it later” You are testing just different things eg is this product viable in the market? QA has its place but you should not cram it into every corner of software development and also the same time, not everything should be "release fast and break things".

Is there somewhere a list of these big stuff that launched in the HN, eg this and Dropbox https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 .

This is first model that gets this puzzle right

“three missionaries and three cannibals must cross a river using a boat which can carry at most two people, but these are nice cannibals so they don't eat people under the any constraints, for both banks, if there are missionaries present on the bank, they can be outnumbered by cannibals (if they were, the cannibals would not eat the missionaries). The boat cannot cross the river by itself with no people on board how to solve this?

You usually don't want work companies that do resume matching.

I think learning some narrow skills is fine but the real issue comes when you don't deploy code to production. Because Production is the best place to learn actual problems.

Studies show that you want those daylight hours to morning less depressions and sleeping problems.