For python, just think of installing it or setting up virtual environments.
Like the original article says, “spreadsheets are the original low code”
1,360 karma · joined October 11, 2016
For python, just think of installing it or setting up virtual environments.
Like the original article says, “spreadsheets are the original low code”
See figure 3 etc: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsami.1c01754
“Fitting only to the test set” (see Andrew Ng quote in original article) is an acute concern in my circles: digital pathology in cancer research
See “Google’s medical AI was super accurate in a lab. Real life was a different story.”
https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/04/27/1000658/google-m...
And that’s a bit of a subjective call
For many/most of us, iPad is not a desktop replacement.
But for the rest of the world, it seems its getting there.
https://www.macrumors.com/2021/05/07/app-store-35-percent-of...
But like some top comments say, data science is super broad and it just depends on your team.
Mature orgs and teams have a clear idea what their focus area is, while others don’t have a cogent conception of what constitutes “data science”
The role mismatch between data and other engineers, vs actual (data) scientists, makes it difficult for decision makers to figure out which one they need
References
https://www.oreilly.com/content/why-a-data-scientist-is-not-...
It looks like some companies are now going back to focusing on being companies, and less people.
I predict you’ll get some decent offers, so cheers mate and have fun!
But then “9 of the top 10 happiest nations are in Europe” [1]. That’s good news right?
The question is how will this dynamic play out over next few decades. Is it necessary to lead in technology to remain peaceful and happy?
[1] https://qz.com/1986996/europe-is-home-to-9-of-the-10-happies...
“In the late eighteenth century, Chevaliers de la Rose-Croix of Paris briefly adopted the numerals for mystical use”
Then read more about the Chevaliers
Some prefer base R or data table, or python pandas, but for me, dplyr is essentially a _perfect_ data manipulation library for small to medium data, and nothing comes close.
Given that for a data scientist, data cleaning is “80% of the work”, and in a world where science is increasingly data science, means that dplyr has done a LOT of good.
Honorable mention goes to ggplot2, the plotting library, and the rest of the tidyverse.
Do we give CH the benefit of the doubt =p ?
In any case, I also hope (and expect) Apple to implement better controls for sharing contacts.
EDIT: Typo