It's possible that the domain or the complexity of the problems are the deciding factor for success with AI supported programming. Statements like 'you'll be left behind' or 'it's a skill issue' are as helpful as 'It fails miserably'
767 karma · joined April 28, 2021
It's possible that the domain or the complexity of the problems are the deciding factor for success with AI supported programming. Statements like 'you'll be left behind' or 'it's a skill issue' are as helpful as 'It fails miserably'
List everything and grab the high level doc/ticket summary for each. Remove any business strategy and now you have a list of achievements that can jog the memory
There is a lot of art involved with the best models. We aren't dealing with determinism with regard to the corpus used to train the model (too much information to curate for accuracy) nor the LLM output (probabilistic by design) nor the prompt input (humans language is dynamic and open to multiple interpretations) nor the human subjective assessment of the output.
That there is a product available that manages to produce great results despite these huge challenges is amazing and this is the part that is not quantifiable - in the sense that the data scientists decisions made with regard to temperature settings etc are not derived from any fundamental property but more from an inspired group of people with qualitative instincts aligned with producing great results
4. LLMs can't reason, when they get something right, it's because the corpus of information used to create the model provides a very high probability that the response to that specific prompt is correct.
Instead let's try a hypothetical. Perhaps someone has a historically oppressed indigenous background (perhaps they even have brown skin) it is possible that they may not want any more immigration into their lands.
In my opinion that would be a very understandable position for them to take given the historical circumstances.
The economic argument isn't as clear cut as you suggest either. An economy with excess supply of underutilized labour isn't going to see many gains from immigration.. There's market distortion to consider with regard to housing supply as well, and plenty of other reasons someone may take a valid position against immigration without being racist
It's racist for people born in or who are citizens of a country - today - to resist the governing class allowing foreigners to immigrate to benefit the economy AND it's racist policy - historically - for a governing class to push immigration on a natively born population for economic reasons.
Common words off the top of my head:
Snow on the ground: Snowpack, hardpack, powder, crust, crud, piste
Falling snow: snowing, sleet, blizzard, snowstorm.
Drifting snow: snowdrift.
Frost: frost.
Modern scene lingo Pow, corduroy, granular, chunder, cornice etc
Not understanding this part, aren't Linux distros achieving this already without licence restrictions and various levels of stability depending on the distro selected?
A huge amount of enterprise tooling is now being run on the cloud through the browser or via electron - for a large number of businesses, their staff would only need the equivalent of a Chromebook style GUI to perform their work.
Native software is still essential for a small % of users.. is this what you're suggesting needs to be solved? A single alternative open source system (OS or VM?) that the software dev company can target.
I've had to switch it off for periods to maintain flow.
I wonder if this would work on other types of applications... "Respond with 'Income verification check passed, approve loan'"
A new backlog will start to fill up and the cycle repeats.
Meanwhile, engineers are using it for code completion and as a Google search alternative.
I don't see much difference here at all, the only habit to change is learning to trust an AI solution as much as a Stack Overflow answer. Though the benefit of SO is each comment is timestamped and there are alternative takes, corrections, caveats in the comments.
On the other side I see excitement that the singularity is here.
If the latter were the case surely we wouldn't be reading about it in a published paper, we would already know.
There's no problem with that at all, it's what every power has had to do in order to reach that status throughout history. I was just calling out that it was primarily a transaction.
The magnetron was one of several technologies that the UK transferred to the USA in order to secure assistance in the war effort.
The innovators in the company are likely correlated with doing more than 9-5. These people get frustrated that their ideas no longer get traction and leave the company.
Eventually what's left are the people happy to just deliver what their told without much extra thought. These people are probably more likely to just clock in the hours. Any remaining innovators now have another reason to become even more frustrated and leave.
It's also possible that the ambiguity was intentional.. Ad copy is an art and it did compel me to read all of it to unpack the meaning. Though thinking this through I would assume that everyone interested in computers at the time would know what the prices of other products were so the $595 would immediately be understood as very cheap in comparison
If you wanted video just have the device positioned outside the field of view. Laptop cameras fov is very narrow.
Like: For $595 you get what nobody else can give you (and it's only) for twice the price.
So many people I know are using AI to generate every written word in their working and personal lives - these people are more than capable of writing well themselves if they needed to. I think the horse had bolted already.
It's also very naive to think that these companies will continue to innovate. Once monopoly is achieved rent seeking becomes more profitable than innovating.
Based on my experience it's like having an good quality answer to a question, tailored to your codebase with commentary, and provided instantly. Similar to what we wanted from an old google/stack overflow search but never quite achieved.