97 karma · joined July 22, 2010
Barring that as a red-green colorblind person, yes red-green contrast is the worst, but way more common are colors that are only different by their red or green strength (especially red). The two most common by far being pink becomes white and purple becomes blue.
Your green-yellow-blue suggestion is actually making the same mistake as red-purple-blue just using green as the fade instead of red. Having said that in my experience red-green colorblindness is actually RED-green colorblindness. So, I would much prefer a green-yellow-blue interface to a red-purple-blue one. As I am much more sensitive to green than red.
The paper seems to imply maybe not? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187962572...
See the section on COVID-19 near the end.
As for homosexuality that is actually specificity mentioned several times in the New Testament. It is one of the very few Levitical laws expressly mentioned as still in force in the New Testament. However, in fairness those same passages also call out those who are adulterous, slanderous, greedy, and drunkards with equal force.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (NIV) 9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
“over the past 15 years. Increased US efforts are correlated with a worsening of the overall terror situation. Statistical modeling indicates for every additional billion dollars spent and 1,000 American troops sent to fight the war on terror, the number of terror attacks worldwide increased by 19 (data available from the author). Furthermore, the model finds up to 80 percent of the variation in the number of worldwide terror attacks since 9/11 can be explained by just those two variables—US money spent and military members sent to fight the war on terror. The data for both money spent and troops deployed come from the Congressional Research Service publication, The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11 by Amy Belasco. The number of terror attacks is from the Global Terrorism Database, hosted by the University of Maryland.”
“The data show countries the US invaded had 143 more terror attacks per year than countries the US did not invade. Similarly, countries in which the US conducted drone strikes were home to 395 more terror attacks per year than those where the US did not.”
https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/issues/Spring...
However, having looked at the wikipedia page on Version Vectors it appears that is a protocol for detecting conflicts. I was interested in how you resolve them.
A simple example is a zip file that I add file A to on one computer and later file B to on another computer. When I sync up do I end up with a zip containing no new files, file A, file B, both files or a corrupt zip file. (Does the answer change if the zip file is encrypted?)
1) How does this system handle two devices behind separate NATs? (aka a work device and a home device.)
2) What is the conflict resolution protocol if a file is modified in two or more locations? (Newest wins, automatic duplication for manual resolution, etc.)