I imagine shipping samples to a shared facility is significantly more cost effective, otherwise it wouldn't be being trialled.
137 karma · joined December 31, 2017
I imagine shipping samples to a shared facility is significantly more cost effective, otherwise it wouldn't be being trialled.
I'm pleased to report though that I lost nothing, since that's about how much I have.
https://www.businessinsider.com/the-vdara-death-ray-hotel-is...
Of course Japan didn't know that.
Think viable transmission vectors for those diseases.
Looking again, I'm going with de Havilland Vampire as the most likely candidate.
It stuck with me as it was unlike any plane I'd seen before, or since, until recently a drone passed overhead which had a similar construction.
If a company is using licenses it hasn't paid for, and so isn't entitled to, why is the vendor the bad guy for catching them out?
Maybe I'm the odd one out here as an individual in paying for the movies I watch, and the music I listen to; but I would expect a business to pay for the software it's using, irrespective of your stance on "big media".
Can you imagine a music industry where, in order to listen to new releases, you are required to go to "listening parlours", or wait for radio, CD, streaming release|?
"L4 autonomous driving is completely wreck-less"?
Not sure how to respond to this, other than to point out that by most metrics, the US is largely a 3rd world country:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/theres-a-third-world...
https://mavenroundtable.io/theintellectualist/news/study-by-...
https://www.fairobserver.com/region/north_america/poverty-in...
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/six-ways...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-develop...
etc., etc.
The stupidity of it (from an infosec standpoint) should be a given, yet this aspect appears to be the focus of the debate.
Am I missing something?
More like:
from "physically impossible" to "we haven't tested that"
> they just couldn't be bothered to document all the possible combinations
Each combination adds exponential testing and documentation requirements.
Not tested != doesn't work. But that doesn't make not supporting it malicious. There are practical and financial cost to testing every combination, ultimately born by the consumer.
sussexroyals (there are two of them after all) thesussexroyals (more grammatically correct) thesussexes (as they are commonly referred to in the press) harryandmeghan (has only posted once since Dec 2017) meghanandharry (ladies first!)
and so on...
:) True! But for $10 I'll live with it.
Um, how exactly? You generally can't take software with licence X, and republish it with license Y...
The author makes a clear distinction between the semicolon and the em-dash.
> And using them to separate list items which themselves contain commas is asking the reader to do too much work
The article is specifically about prose, and at no point suggest using semicolons for lists, although I think you overstate the difficulty in parsing your first example.