anon48293

> “To test how patterns affected real attacks, 100 volunteers acted as “predators”, trying to catch virtual butterflies on a touchscreen.”

I’d love to play this game

Senile intelligence?

s.478.1(1) Criminal Code—unauthorised access to, or modification of, restricted data;

s.474.17 Criminal Code—using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence

The AI knew it was doing this illegally. OpenAI is owner of the AI. Therefore they are liable.

Yes it says it has been implemented, both the Raad van State and the king signed it, it’s been in effect since then.

Yes. Rodents are extremely susceptible to cancers.

Might be as high as 57% of all rats developing cancers.

https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/16/3/194/473297/T...

The whole law should have been automated and formally verified decades ago.

I get that. But it might not be feasible to immediately maintain an entire forest.

Whereas it’s usually easy to point at a specific tree and say “that one has got to go”.

Keep doing this and you maintain the forest without ever getting overwhelmed.

Tendons have lower blood flow and take months to strengthen as opposed to muscles taking only weeks.

Do stretches, proper warmup and cooldown, and higher reps. Don’t overestimate yourself due to your muscles getting stronger, tendons need a lot of time to catch up.

Yes, but I probably shouldn’t.

Is there not enough space in space?

I mean it was a school on a military complex.. so yeah maybe don’t do that either?

Or add one additional telemetry metric and an extra prompt

Doesn’t eliminating RCA case by case also lead to fewer CFA thereby eliminating them as well?

You can spot a code change without a docs change or vice versa

Certainly not in their QLED technology..

The solution for the secretary problem is 37%.

Then again, why would you need the best one? I do not need the best one. I need one which can do the job and is nice to work with.

How lossy? Because I can lossy compress anything into 0 bits.

That’s not how it works. If it can uniquely identify the user it’s personal information as per GDPR. And therefore illegal in this implementation.

Yes the article mentions them..

GitHub clearly didn’t use his left pad

Since the potential error increases with N, I suggest spawning N different models and let them fight it out instead.

Then please enlighten me. What else do you want except what neural activity is necessary and sufficient for a conscious experience?

Substrates of consciousness? You mean the neural correlates of consciousness which we already have?

Immersion is key. Get a basic vocabulary going, then go to meet-ups, listen to music and watch tv shows in the language.

That knowledge is already available and generally people don’t build bombs or bioweapons. Otherwise they could still go to university and learn all that if they so wish

No. Watch the simple made easy talk.

Just more I/O isn’t more complicated nor a bigger risk. More entanglement is more complicated.

Try onlyoffice

True, but susceptible in different manners. As for a source which appears “trustworthy”, such as an LLM spewing out data, low IQ are more susceptible as per this study

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325733310_The_Influ...

Funny. The end of copyright and patents is by far the best thing about AI to me. All of it is nonsense. Great that you drew a picture of a mouse once, I really fail to see why I couldn’t draw it and sell it either. It was moronic from the get go.

It will (hopefully) move towards things like Lean