https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/mary-norris-diaeresi...
1,206 karma · joined November 19, 2010
https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/mary-norris-diaeresi...
The next time you need that same book, the librarian doesn't have to go all the way to the stacks again – they can just grab it from the shelf behind the counter.”
This is missing the step where after you return the book to the librarian, they put it on the shelf behind the counter.
Then if you want you can talk about the shelf only fitting a limited number of books, and the librarian having to decide what to do if the shelf is full.
For example, here’s a book using that title
https://m.libreriauniversitaria.it/amp/product/BIT/978887928...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half_marathon_world_record_p...
There don’t tend to be laws against liking kites or airplanes, nor violence against people who like them on the basis of that interest.
https://www.wwaytv3.com/i-was-going-to-die-man-goes-overboar...
I don’t see how either of those can be considered winning the lottery, to use your phrase.
Also “In 2021, 1,353,500 fires resulted in 3,800 civilian deaths and 14,700 injuries”. By comparison, Wikipedia says there were 42,915 deaths due to motor vehicles in 2021, more than 10x. So it makes sense that even if fire department only dealt with road crashes they would spend more time on that than on fires.
That review describes a conflict between two of the founders which today I find baffling: “Dorsey saw Twitter as a way to update one’s “status,” the ability to say what you’re doing the moment you’re doing it. Williams saw Twitter as a way to describe what’s happening in the world around you.”
https://twitter.com/benedictevans/status/397814437014700032?...
https://allthingsd.com/20131104/in-hatching-twitter-a-billio...
Add up many such decisions and you get the current car dependence of the United States.
Perhaps that’s because they pay no cost for privatizing a part of a public way.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peerages_in_the_United_Kingd...
This is the crucial distinction which one must disregard in order to argue such equivalences.
Today I learned: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Carasso
“On my first official day rotating on the team, my new manager sent me a string of messages over company chat… He was trying to stay out of trouble at work, he said, but he couldn't help getting in trouble, because he was looking for women to have sex with… When I reported the situation, I was told by both HR and upper management that even though this was clearly sexual harassment and he was propositioning me, it was this man's first offense, and that they wouldn't feel comfortable giving him anything other than a warning and a stern talking-to… Within a few months, he was reported once again for inappropriate behavior, and those who reported him were told it was still his "first offense". The situation was escalated as far up the chain as it could be escalated, and still nothing was done.”
https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2017/2/19/reflecting-on-on...
See eg this from the New York Public Library: https://www.nypl.org/blog/2013/07/02/name-changes-ellis-isla...
(The mandated adoption of surnames is a pretty complex topic and of course proceeded in different ways in various times and places.)