2,470 karma · joined January 29, 2019
Policy wonks and lawyers have run America into the ground with reckless spending and forever wars.
I would venture that introducing fresh ideas and technologists with first principles thinking will yield better results.
Genuinely don't know why anyone would use it when you have perplexity, gemini, chatGPT search, etc. at your disposal.
Advertising is 80% of Google's business. If you think those things aren't being factored into their ads model.... Idk what to tell you.
Also have you talked to any Gen Z or millennial? Most cannot afford housing, why in the world would you introduce even more demand for scarce housing?
A fantastic system, just ask the Soviet Union.
Losing out on a house bid as an American citizen to an undocumented migrant thanks to this policy, truly the type of stuff only a CA politician could come up with.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/california-democrats...
Ah yes all of this provided to you by Big Government, who can at a whim withdraw these services if you are found to engage in WrongThink.
We already have seen Western governments like Canada financially banning grandmothers who donated to a trucker protest or the UK imprisoning people for tweets.
Do you really want a bunch of DC politicians to have the power of life and death, not to mention access to swaths of capital that they will inevitably use to engorge and enrich themselves?
Your 600k in taxes will go into the pockets of various interest groups that markup their goods and services because they know Uncle Sam will foot the bill.
LLMs can be used to generate high-quality, human-like content such as articles, blog posts, social media posts, and even short stories. Businesses can leverage this capability to save time and resources on content creation, and improve the consistency and quality of their online presence.
2. Customer Service and Support:
LLMs can be integrated into chatbots and virtual assistants to provide fast, accurate, and personalized responses to customer inquiries. This can help businesses improve their customer experience, reduce the workload on human customer service representatives, and provide 24/7 support.
3. Summarization and Insights:
LLMs can be used to analyze large volumes of text data, such as reports, research papers, or customer feedback, and generate concise summaries and insights. This can be valuable for businesses in fields like market research, financial analysis, or strategic planning.
4. HR Candidate Screening:
Use case: Using LLMs to assess job applicant resumes, cover letters, and interview responses to identify the most qualified candidates. Example: A large retailer integrating an LLM-based recruiting assistant to help sift through hundreds of applications for entry-level roles.
5. Legal Document Review:
Use case: Employing LLMs to rapidly scan through large volumes of legal contracts, case files, and regulatory documents to identify key terms, risks, and relevant information. Example: A corporate law firm deploying an LLM tool to streamline the due diligence process for mergers and acquisitions.
Was pretty helpful for me, basically acted as a heads up display that I could look at to track my stats over the day (steps, meditation, focus time, etc.)
Building and deploying a state of the anrt image classifier in lesson 1, less than an hour was incredibly motivating.
Only time I use WhatsApp is when I’m traveling overseas.
We're waking up from a a long night of heavy drinking (free money via zero interest rate, unrestrained QE, etc.), the bill is due and you're plugging your ears and yelling that the party must go on.
Makes total sense to me.
Let alone flagging/deprioritizing it via some draconian legislation?
Totally, like there's no way an AI company could hit $80M revenue in <2 years [0], or power the recommendations systems for billions of dollars worth of online commerce.
Also there's no way that it could generate audio/image/video/text that would trick the average person that this was generated by an AI.
I believe in property rights, but patenting ideas leads to such perverse incentives that the benefits rarely outweigh the cost. Often times the person isn't even the first to come up with the idea! They're just the first to patent it.
Look at the field of psychedelics for example, where there's a mad scramble to patent things as absurd as the process of administering the psychedelic.
From drugs, to technology, I would say IP rights have done more harm than good. Especially when you consider the number of patent trolls that waste countless of hours and money.
Humans are not islands, nothing you make is yours. It is likely a remix of someone else's idea or influence.
I still haven’t found one company where this principle didn’t show up.
This comes across as very ill informed. I suggest you actually use some of the AI essay-writing services because they are pretty indistinguishable at this point from human writing.
Here’s one I particularly like -
I'm sorry but until you've experienced a startup shutting down the product that you built your whole knowledge repo around, you won't really understand the need for portability.
I could care less about the shiny features, because I know that in 10 years this product will be defunct, while markdown will still exist.
Until those services are inevitably hacked, as we've seen most of these companies play fast and loose with security.
That is the intention. I don't want excitement with my note-taking, I want plain, boring, open-standards that will survive the test of time.
Chances are high that your startup will: 1) Fail 2) Get acquired and gets shut down 3) Aggressively monetize leading to poor UI/UX (i.e. Evernote)
The whole advantage of Obsidian is that it relies on an open format, and makes it easy to transition to a new platform
I want a system that I know 20 years from now I can still use (or can transition to a better one).
Maybe I'm in the minority but I've tried at least 10 different note taking apps over the last decade, and none of them have staying power because they all fall into the three issues I outlined above.
Yes, basic logic. Central banks purchasing assets like index funds, bonds, etc. will naturally cause prices to rise.
I’m not entirely sure how you can steel man an argument that printing trillions of dollars will not lead to higher inflation but I’m happy to hear it.
The funny thing is most of what you call bad faith questioning ended up being approved by “Science” (cloth masks being ineffective, how the virus transmitted, covid origins, etc.)
Unfortunately it seems like for you and many others, science has turned into a religion conducted by a priestly class that cannot be questioned.