ande-mnoc

What does OpenAI have anything to do with this?

I still don’t understand why Anthropic posted this. This is just basically saying GLM-5.3 is almost as good as Mythos but sans the limits?

> A Lovable preview is not a static page.

> The catch is not that Vite does anything wrong

> These are not toy apps.

> One caveat keeps the speed numbers honest

It’s so tiring.

Both the abstract and the introduction score a 100% on Pangram. What’s going on there?

CEO of Oreo Cookies: the oreo cookie is as important as oxygen.

Refreshing to see a post that gets straight to the point and not hide the data behind pages of prose.

This is what the “Allow Chrome sign-in” setting is for and is turned off by the post author.

Thankfully, second order effect is a spectrum and not a black-and-white thing.

Yes, why not?

I instinctively distrust any company that makes their national origin the main selling point. To me that's a subtle signal that they cannot compete on technical merit.

The screenshots were deleted a month ago.

https://github.com/ravynsoft/website/commit/1a576c1d8f2fa964...

Ctrl-F “prolog”: 0 result. :-/

I assume you don’t use Claude a lot? If you interact with it on a daily basis, it becomes your second instinct to identify its writing. Anthropic models talk like they are penalized by making sentences flow naturally. "The X I didn’t expect" is basically a mandatory section of a Claude-authored blog post at this point.

You are expecting people to read 25K+ lines of code in a single Python file that is generated by LLM and then translate all the comments written in Russian?

100% on Pangram.

It’s very poetic that codes written without human efforts can be efficiently dealt without human efforts.

The Kotlin/WASM work is in the main repo. This submission has no source code and barely any technical detail.

If anything it proves the opposite imo.

Will they revisit the decision to not add a permission model to VSCode extensions?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43181789

> The “two or more in that hour” filter on the inner query is doing important work.

This is Claude talking isn’t it.

It’s a factual statement on how they misused the funds.

Please just state directly why you find the inclusion objectionable.

> I'm not entirely sure why that's relevant

Because they are funding young people to visit Israel and this gives it context.

You need to remember one is investing heavily in clean energy and expanding its capacity rapidly and the other one is not.

Fully AI generated according to Pangram.

Can we have a rule where LLM generated texts require a disclosure or be removed?

Edit: The entire blog seems AI generated. Huh.

Well I have great news. Complaining about AI detection comments is not going to make it go away.

They serve as helpful warnings to other readers so they don’t need to waste their time. I’m sure I’m not the only one to appreciate a heads up.

Not much we can do here if you think everything is about bragging.

> virtual signaling

We just say random words now?

100% AI written according to Pangram, damn.

I mean, if you read the entire story and all the horrific incidents happening to Indigenous people across the country and still made it about yourself, not much I can say about it.

Did you actually read the article? Because I did.

The case was well reported in media and they basically all agree that it’s a symptom of systemic racism against Indigenous people in Canada. The hospital staff thought she was on welfare based on her ethnicity in this case, or straight out “bet” on the patient’s blood level in another case in BC the same year. She would have got the same treatment even if she spoke French.

> If you think racism in Quebec doesn’t have a connection with language

Where have I said this? Not everything is about the language though.