Feedback welcome. Still beta
But the Chrome extension is 1.0 and doing really well!
Knotable.com/chrome/note
124 karma · joined July 10, 2009
amolsarva.com is about me
Feedback welcome. Still beta
But the Chrome extension is 1.0 and doing really well!
Knotable.com/chrome/note
Simple, stylish new tab screen that lets you type notes from the place where your ADD strikes worst: in the browser
- from the makers, Knotable
He namechecks this great older post on PR and conferences and how to launch: http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2011/09/15.html
Worth a re-look for every startup founder
The shortest possible version is: launch is important
It's amazingly underused and it's great to see modernizing approaches to the "command line" to the brain.
I have tried to replace the set on an ipod touch in the past. Didn't succeed. Screwed up taking the face/body assembly apart.
Not sure those folks are quacks
But this is indeed a very promising field with powerful technology
- co-founder with five other neuroscientists of this company --> HaloNeuro.com --> drop us a line and get involved in our clinical trials if you are interested in this topic around SF or NY
It is why airplanes are such great places to concentrate and work.
Also lower light and fewer people "induce the zone" better too.
Part of the job is keeping the wrong people out. That's how to keep them out. Http://a.sarva.co explains why
As for what else they add -- I'll find out next week in Paris at their summit next to Le Web. I suspect the 100s of CEOs they have backed and big european network will be things I value. They are relevant for the company I'm building.
I think the Kima pitch has a lot in common with the PG worldview -- founders want fast decisions, money, network. Maybe they want a school or maybe they can run a school; founders vary.
More reason to think they might "beat" Facebook is that a) many are already owned by Internet giants, i.e., have tons of resources to drive growth. WeChat is owned by Tencent/QQ and Line by South Korea's Naver. And b) they are Asia-centric where Facebook is weaker. Maybe these "international" players end up beating Facebook on its home turf.
Can't any email sender spoof the sender identity in various ways, e.g., from name, signature, and sure this picture badge thing?
I guess ideas for movies and creative stuff are similar.
And for those who follow startup culture we all know there is a massive gulf between those who try to actually do stuff and those who just tinker forever. This guy in the article is the sad "I never tried" type.
As a guy who has built a bunch of big startups myself (a.sarva.co) I meet these guys all the time and feel bad when I do. The only advice is DO IT!!!
It's a whole other ball of wax once you meet those guys who DO start -- it's not just DO IT DO IT till it works (repetition). At that point you have someone who DOES stuff. So now they/we/me must work intelligently to do successful stuff.
I think folks in the comments here may be missing that distinction.
But what do you email ABOUT that's what I meant... Like emails from Amazon are plainly not "doing email". That stuff should go somewhere else
Similar downside for...driver's licenses, passports, political contributions, subscriptions to magazines or any other database where it is useful to have records of who does what.
And the ones with guns may well be easy to invade. It happened to the mom of that killer last week.
It's not a good argument but the gun fans do make it repeatedly.
This is very silly -- there are plenty of maps to use to find banks, gun stores, gasoline, fertilizer...or rich people's homes.
- hosted gmail account - set up easily for me
- sucked in my mail fast too
- prioritized the inbox pretty ok, but will have to try in the AM when I have more BS mail not just late night 'real' mail
- UI is a little slow I guess. You need a ? shortcut to prompt keyboard shortcuts
- I like the approach: just be an alternative UI to the gmail engine. You can coast on their infrastructure. Others are doing this too like Handle, AltoMail, others
TAKE IT FROM ME...
- Peek also got constantly dinged to "hey, support Exchange!" but we never got far with corporate users even when we bent over backwards to support them
- gmail was the vast majority of users
- outlook/hotmail is actually large and super annoying to support. you need a special partnership license with msft and we went and got one. email me if you want help/access. amol at peek dot ly
- yahoo you can use imap back door. also very large
- power users: we were a cheap, simple gadget so power users would criticize us on the one hand but then not use us since they weren't going to abandon their blackberry anyway (or android, later). In this case though, it seems Inky needs to work well for power users. So this performance stuff people are complaining about needs to be better
SUGGESTIONS
- weird that you didn't start with a mobile app
- a bit weird to create a 'desktop client' that is actually just a web app container (that's what it is right?)
- efforts like thunderbird or postbox at least "get your mail on your pc" which has a neat quality to it. Inky doesn't do that. What's the advantage of being a desktop app here?
- the overall betterness of Inky isn't apparent. The UI does resemble the "3.0" looks of a bunch of other mail apps as commenters have mentioned. There are some usability tweaks but also some steps back. I am most excited about the relevance and smart views -- this is the area nobody is doing well yet. The "algo for your email". I guess I need to use it more to see this benefit? </pre>
I'm excited to find my next mail client. I really don't like Gmail and the death of Thunderbird was sad for me. I want you guys to make something awesome!
That's back when Apple made everything 3-Dish and liquid and transparent. It did indeed change a whole 5-year chunk of UI designs. Maybe it was even the first skeumorphism...it looks like water