540 karma · joined July 14, 2014
> Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. No physical injury is required, but the actor must have intended to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the victim and the victim must have thereby been put in immediate apprehension of such a contact.
Calmly ignoring the threat is evidence that the person was not "in immediate apprehension of such a contact".
I only bring this up because i think it's interesting, and the underlying point you are making is 100% correct. This kind of thing is not normal nor innocent and not to be tolerated.
I'm not sure what this is referring to here. The "Getting Started" guide for ClojureScript uses deps.edn and the clojure CLI to introduce ClojureScript. You can certainly use figwheel or shadow-cljs with clojure tools.deps and deps.edn. And since the new build.tools allows just running a program, you can of course build clojurescript from a `build.clj` build script. I cannot think of a step in this process that isn't amenable or simplified by the use of the clojure cli, tools.deps, and now build.tools.
It's a standard definition that means we can talk about ordered pairs but still ground it in set theory.
(if (test) (then) (else))
(if true #_(test) (then) (else))
(if false #_(test) (then) (else))
makes it quite simple to leave the tests in. Also, quite easy to raise forms (structurally raise) and reevaluate the form and then undo but not reevaluate the form to have it modified. ((juxt type identity) (clojure.edn/read-string "x"))
[clojure.lang.Symbol x]
It seems that the reader returns symbols just fine.Presumably you would agree that not all of discovery is also invention. So doesn't that restore the original question of asking whether mathematics is an invention or discovery which is not invention?
> "Our top priority continues to be the safety of our employees, which is why we invested in a rigorous toxicology study to determine if there was a universal scientific issue with the uniform," Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) said in a statement in response to the May lawsuit. "The results of the study confirm our uniforms meet the highest textile standards (OEKO-TEX) with the exception of the optional flight attendant apron, which we removed from the collection."
Delta took this seriously and commissioned a toxicology study. The results are that the clothing meets the highest textile standards. What should Delta do at this time?
> My suggestion was quite simple: Put that needed code number in a little capsule, and then implant that capsule right next to the heart of a volunteer. The volunteer would carry with him a big, heavy butcher knife as he accompanied the President. If ever the President wanted to fire nuclear weapons, the only way he could do so would be for him first, with his own hands, to kill one human being. The President says, "George, I'm sorry but tens of millions must die." He has to look at someone and realize what death is—what an innocent death is. Blood on the White House carpet. It's reality brought home.
> When I suggested this to friends in the Pentagon they said, "My God, that's terrible. Having to kill someone would distort the President's judgment. He might never push the button."
> — Roger Fisher, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 1981
> This (my) generation has been culturally conditioned against the idea of quitting a job
This is a super bizarre claim. Wealthy Googlers are afraid to quit their job because of their peers who make a fraction of their pay? We're talking about Silicon Valley workers and somehow they are more afraid to quit their job than the previous generations? A common job strategy is to change jobs every two to three years.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/becsoj/tim_baldrid...
The author can clarify but if that's the critique its not without at least some merit.
It sounds very much like your opinions on current political topics.
This sounds crazy to me. My last company would freak out if the dev team got together and discussed the person's politics and if we thought they should be hired or not based on that. I hope they do stop this.
The more i think about this the crazier it sounds. Imagine a Houston oil consultancy firm discussing a candidate who applied and asking "when we talked about lowering taxes, did the inflection in his voice sound real or feigned?". This is what an "old boys club" looks like.
With ad networks and IP logging does this requirement of erasing and copies become more onerous?