494 karma · joined February 23, 2017
https://superuser.com/questions/1346634/modern-browser-with-...
This is really interesting and available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbGNZQvobkc
In the second case all human-level maths would be solved and what lies beyond would be always out of our scope.
It would be more like Lem's novel where it completely disappears from the human horizon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem_XIV
hyperfine 'emacsclient -n -r file' gives me only 15ms on average
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22f...
Edit: Low quality may be the result of adding vinegar instead of relying on natural fermentation. Also cabagge should be cut really fine, otherwise the copious amount of juice is not really there to keep it going
Fun fact, it gets gradually better with each reheating
https://www.livescience.com/space/the-sun/space-photo-of-the...
Edit: Maybe I should try reducing the dose even further (to 200 μg) as mentioned in other posts here
Will be in Saragossa on Wednesday and gonna use Canon binos with image stabilization, the partial phase with filter and then some precious seconds without (a scary moment, I'll rely on an alarm to prevent my eyes to get damaged when the totality is over). Some people generally advised to skip any instruments and just enjoy it with your own eyes for the first time, but I'm too curious about corona details to let this opportunity pass.
I agree that language processing is different, but some similarities do exist.
The rules of go could be explained to a 4 years old. On the other hand, the superficial complexity of so many framworks/systems is just a facade and nothing more.
The same goes for NP-hard problems where complex solutions have trivial verification methods.