Unless someone signed a long term contract I don't see anything wrong with this.
442 karma · joined February 8, 2018
Unless someone signed a long term contract I don't see anything wrong with this.
The reasonable perspective does not. It demonstrates that though agency is limited it does exist.
Our life outcomes are connected to our actions. For many their circumstances make this an unpleasant thought, thus binary thinking protect their self-image. For some that's all they have left.
In ethereum address appear like 0x233eb...042, ENS let's you associate a human readable name like nick.eth with that address.
Works similar to DNS, turning IP addresses into something we humans recognize.
What's the pro of using a smart contract? (DNS works without one).
With a smart contract you can have immutable data store (assuming ethereum continues) that can give you ownership over your name, like nick.eth.
What's the con?
It's immutable which means people can own names they shouldn't with no mediation process possible.
Like a lot of things in life the system is good as long the system works for you, but not everyone is lucky enough to exist in a system that works well enough.
Crypto* is trying to make things better.
edit: *some people are others are not
hats off
2. https://nftychat.xyz/ [0]
[0] I'm the co-founder
do i own the house i bought? well, yes as long i keep paying property taxes.
what is ownership really and how much more/less does one own crypto vs. money in bank. is it quantity dependent? is it time sensitive?
there are no certainties in life, besides death and taxes.
i wonder if there is a /remind me in 5 years feature on hackernews
give value as soon as possible.
the exchange i use has already KYC'ed me intensively and they know which wallets i use.
My real name is connected to my wallet publicly, I have no issues with KYC for my own wallets.
I still find stable coins useful.
one key management wallet i like is https://www.argent.xyz/
maybe this is rudimentary by traditional standards but this an advancement for wallet management.
the key feature is you can recover access to your assets even if you lose your keys through social recovery.
would i rather have an entity that i have no power against (google) or only my own error? the outcome is the same, i had x, now i don't. personally, i'd prefer being responsible, but it is a by a thin margin.
that being said, key management has and will continue to get easier. so over time, the risk of key loss should diminish.
That chapter alone is worth reading the entire book for.
a lot of famous folks have already using them [1].
see
[1] https://spkz.io/
[3] https://gm.xyz/
*disclosure i'm a co-founder of #2
by Mark Kistler
This was great.
The next RSU vest is always right around the corner.
What were some of your painful lessons you wished you learned sooner?
Easy to destroy a poorly constructed argument.
Those who could have a well constructed argument often choose to spend their explanation energy on those who are less skeptical.
In business, finding work that you like.
In fitness, finding workouts that you enjoy.
In health, finding foods you like that are good for you.
Lastly, you can't make people want to change. You can only guide them once they show that they want to change. This is different from wanting a result. Someone who wants to be more successful is very different from someone who wants to learn how to work more effectively. Focus on process over end goal.