1,486 karma · joined July 29, 2013
Wut
Just losing that future option value is sufficient to deem such a move insane regardless of original jurisdiction - unless for some reason there is zero other option.
That would be genuinely insane.
Have you spent any time around white American females?
Zoning is not needed for the former.
The root of the problem is that humans have evolved anti-market biases that served us well when living in tribal communes but which are Pareto inefficient when living in large billion person societies.
http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/10/price-gouging-a...
If Uber could help usher in the end of some of the other government monopolies, we'd be looking at some huge steps forward.
I have no idea what unfortunate psychological characteristic of the human brain leads so many to oppose price gouging and markets, but here is some tangential discussion:
http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/10/price-gouging-a...
Everyone here compares climate denial to other left wing bugaboos: 'creationism' 'ancient science' 'earth is the center of the universe'
So why not compare to things where the left wing is wrong?
Why not say, "if we're not going to give equal time to one thing where science is settled (climate change), we also shouldn't give equal time to..."
1. Economic fact: Minimum wage hurts low earners
2. Economic fact: Free trade is almost always good
3. Economic fact: Unions hurt the poor
So is climate change really something you care about, or is it just another tool to be deployed in the left-right debate?
The left brings climate change - their settled science - the right brings anti union policies - their settled science. Each side has heterodox scientists, each side has the vast consensus of professionals on their side. Yet only one topic gets a zillion upvotes on HN, only one topic gets extensive coverage on our favorite media aggregators.
I wonder why.
It would not.
Not to mention 15th C Spain.