First paragraph on their page disqualifies it completely. I do not want my passwords on anybody’s servers.
Our secure cloud syncing features allow you to access your data from anywhere, on any device! Your vault is conveniently optimized for use on desktop, laptop, tablet, and phone devices.
That may be behind the Eero move to go subscription only. Could be good if implemented properly but much more expensive that just buying a high end router.
If you just need to follow speed limits, Tesla can do it perfectly fine. It knows speed limits for most roads. It would fail if the speed limit is due to construction or speed trap :-)
I have tried the download and the just took me to the “try for free” subscription version. I did not want to import my data so I bailed out :-(. Not sure if one can try desktop beta.
Anybody with good security background care to comment on the white paper mentioned in the article - https://1password.com/files/1Password%20for%20Teams%20White%.... Troy seems to endorse their cloud service. I am paranoid and do not like my password stored there :-)
If it is meaningful to only a small portion of the population then that portion should pay for obtaining this information and not force the rest to pay. If you add legal costs these warning like most of regulations are really expensive.
If you never driven Tesla you do not know what a joy is to use the auto pilot in stop and go traffic. I see 2-3 accidents daily caused by your "alert" drivers rear ending cars. Your statement may be true for long haul rides, but I pretty sure the numbers will come ahead for the auto steerer for the normal commute.
(NotSo) SmartThings is extremely unreliable. Even simple routines will randomly fail at least once a month. It is fine system for toys, but I would not put it on anything the you care about - like home security.
I find it fascinating that when there is a discussion about age discrimination, most commenters have "advice" for the old farts how to stay current, learn current hip tech, be willing to work longer hours etc. However, we we talk about women in computing, it is always sexism and the discussion is about how the corporations need to change to attract more women. Pretty asymmetrical, don't you think?
Seems like "It has rarely happened to the benefit of small/medium businesses." and "The companies that most struggle with red tape aren't mega-corps but the smaller companies" are contradictory. Not sure if I understand if you are for or against removing red tape.
“With war looming, it’s time to be prepared. So last week I switched to a fixed-rate mortgage. It means higher monthly payments, but I’m terrified about what will happen to interest rates once financial markets wake up to the implications of skyrocketing budget deficits. From a fiscal point of view the impending war is a lose-lose proposition. If it goes badly, the resulting mess will be a disaster for the budget. If it goes well, administration officials have made it clear that they will use any bump in the polls to ram through more big tax cuts, which will also be a disaster for the budget. Either way, the tide of red ink will keep on rising.”—Paul Krugman, New York Times, March 11, 2003
Not really, the real question is at the end of article: "There's just one question: Do we love our Seattle process too much?" There is a choice - you can have process, permits, etc or you can have fast connections. The problem is that we pretend that you can have both, or that there is no cost to the Seattle process.
We should have a rule that prevents people quiting thier perfectly sensible jobs to work on startups. They are risky as hell and when fali founders are burden to society.