HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

alanwatts

375 karma · joined February 7, 2016

submissionscomments
alanwatts··on U.S. judge throws out cell phone 'stingray' evidence
>I think it's a pretty good heuristic though, the innocent pay a (hopefully) small price from time to time, in exchange more "bad guys" get caught.

The architects of our legal framework thought otherwise:

>it’s of more importance to community, that innocence should be protected, than it is, that guilt should be punished; for guilt and crimes are so frequent in the world, that all of them cannot be punished; and many times they happen in such a manner, that it is not of much consequence to the public, whether they are punished or not. But when innocence itself, is brought to the bar and condemned, especially to die, the subject will exclaim, it is immaterial to me, whether I behave well or ill; for virtue itself, is no security. And if such a sentiment as this, should take place in the mind of the subject, there would be an end to all security what so ever.

-John Adams' Argument for the Defense: 3–4 December 1770

http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/05-03-02-0001-0...

alanwatts··on Riffle: an efficient communication system with strong anonymity
Compromised endpoints is the elephant in the room in the crypto debate.
alanwatts··on The link between language and cognition is a red herring
>We walked down the path to the well-house, attracted by the fragrance of the honeysuckle with which it was covered. Some one was drawing water and my teacher placed my hand under the spout. As the cool stream gushed over one hand she spelled into the other the word water, first slowly, then rapidly. I stood still, my whole attention fixed upon the motions of her fingers. Suddenly I felt a misty consciousness as of something forgotten — a thrill of returning thought; and somehow the mystery of language was revealed to me. I knew then that "w-a-t-e-r" meant the wonderful cool something that was flowing over my hand. That living word awakened my soul, gave it light, hope, joy, set it free! There were barriers still, it is true, but barriers that could in time be swept away.

>I left the well-house eager to learn. Everything had a name, and each name gave birth to a new thought. As we returned to the house every object which I touched seemed to quiver with life. That was because I saw everything with the strange, new sight that had come to me.

-Helen Keller, The Story of My Life

alanwatts··on What media companies don’t want you to know about ad blockers
>why do you have the right to do that?

A free human being should have the right to choose the information that goes into their mind, without that right, how can we make free decisions? If it's an all or nothing deal, then your information is clearly lacking intrinsic value, I can find that elsewhere.

>Why is it that you morally think it's okay to just consume content others have created without paying?

If I write a poem, make 7 billion copies, and mail it to everyone in the world, I'd be silly to think those 7 billion people are morally wrong for not paying me.

Monetary payments are based on the assumptions of scarcity and contractual agreements between two parties. Neither of these two things exist for public facing websites.

alanwatts··on NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden documents show (2013)
>So we shouldn't have done anything..?

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So, I'm not saying we shouldn't do anything, though that might would be better than repeating ourselves over and over again in an infinite negative feedback loop, manufacturing that which we seek to eliminate. For every innocent life that has been taken a hundred revengeful combatants are born from that persons friends and family.

>The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. So it goes. ... Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.

-Dr. King, Where Do We Go From Here? 1967

http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentse...

alanwatts··on NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden documents show (2013)
Killing someone because they killed someone is an infinite loop.
alanwatts··on Is productivity the victim of its own success?
Could you define what you mean by "markets"? It seems like a very abstract, ambiguous term
alanwatts··on 45 years after the Pentagon Papers, a new challenge to government secrecy
Well, it's on his wiki[1], but most information about this part of the Iran-Contra is questionable, and Ross is very cagey about what he says in his interviews. The last person[2] to really take a deep look into this part of the story killed himself, by shooting himself in the head -- twice.

>According to the October 2013 Esquire article, “Between 1982 and 1989, federal prosecutors estimated, Ross bought and resold several metric tons of cocaine. In 1980 dollars, his gross earnings were said to be in excess of $900 million – with a profit of nearly $300 million. Converted roughly to present-day dollars: 2.5 billion gross, and $850 million in profit, respectively. As his distribution empire grew to include forty-two cities, the price he paid per kilo of powder cocaine dropped from as much as $60,000 to as low as $10,000. ”

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/"Freeway"_Rick_Ross

[2]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Webb

alanwatts··on CIA Director John Brennan Pretends Foreign Cryptography Doesn't Exist
Which one is worse?
alanwatts··on 45 years after the Pentagon Papers, a new challenge to government secrecy
>In the rare cases when corruption was masked by military secrets, e.g. the Iran Contra affair, the profits were small (in the tens of thousands

Where did you get that figure? Ricky Ross made billions personally on that racket

alanwatts··on Americans' Confidence in Institutions Stays Low
>I'd hypothesize that most of what's important in the world is accomplished and has been accomplished by large institutions.

Teams of people are good at solving problems that individuals could not do by themselves, nothing new there. On the flip side of this hypothesis, the most grievous acts have also been committed by teams of people.

Accountability and transparency are the important factors here.

alanwatts··on Why Online Voting Is a Danger to Democracy
Most votes are already bought and manipulated by the handful of people who own the television coverage of the election, by tilting that coverage in favor of their favorite candidate.
alanwatts··on Why Online Voting Is a Danger to Democracy
>Whilst standard paper voting may also be subject to fraud, it takes the manipulation of thousands of people in order to alter ballots across a whole country. Computers just need the one hack.

And yet it remains far easier to hack a human administrator than to hack the system they administrate.

So it's really 1000 easy hacks vs 1 really hard hack.

alanwatts··on We won the battle for Linux, but we're losing the battle for freedom
Violence and waging war is/was commonly considered an honorable deed by many tribal cultures.

Pathological inequality is not.

>laws are there to enforce our human understanding of fairness against our human nature of selfishness and greed.

The fallacy of this statement is that laws are just words in paper which have no power to enforce itself.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

alanwatts··on We won the battle for Linux, but we're losing the battle for freedom
>Rules are necessary to create a level playing field when power distributions are asymmetric.

It's a Catch-22 when the rules (laws written on paper) were what made the power distributions so greatly asymmetric in the first place.

This is quite obvious when studying tribal cultures as compared to civilized cultures. It's also worth noting the inherent distributed organizational design of tribal cultures as compared to the inherently centralized design of civilized cultures.

>Before our white brothers arrived to make us civilized men, we didn't have any kind of prison. Because of this, we didn't have any delinquents. Without a prison, there can't be no delinquents. We had no locks nor keys therefore among us there were no thieves. When someone was so poor that he couldn't afford a horse, a tent or a blanket, he would, in that case, receive it all as a gift. We were too uncivilized to give great importance to private property. We didn't know any kind of money and consequently, the value of a human being was not determined by his wealth. We had no written laws laid down, no lawyers, no politicians, therefore we were not able to cheat and swindle one another. We were really in bad shape before the white man arrived and I don't know how to explain how we were able to manage without these fundamental things that (so they tell us) are so necessary for a civilized society.

-Lame Deer

alanwatts··on Selfishness Is Learned: We tend to be cooperative unless we think too much
>However if you're not my friend, I have no reason to take financial risks for you however small.

Technically that's not true. In the cases of con men, social engineers, and manipulators "giving free stuff" is a common psychological tactic to gain leverage over others. I.e. the sub prime mortgage scam bubble of 2008.

alanwatts··on Selfishness Is Learned: We tend to be cooperative unless we think too much
When you have a choice, yes. Although when taxes are autodeducted from your paycheck you don't have much of a choice but to cooperate, unless you want to quit your job.

Thoreau was famous for his non cooperative "civil disobedience" which entailed not paying taxes. He ended up in jail for it but he achieved his desired effect in the long run.

Gandhi read of Thoreau's tactics and in turn led a movement in India where millions refused to pay the salt tax to the British Empire.

alanwatts··on The effects of living in a poor neighborhood
"Racial segregation as a way of life did not come about as a natural result of hatred between the races immediately after the Civil War. There were no laws segregating the races then. And as the noted historian, C. Vann Woodward, in his book, The Strange Career of Jim Crow, clearly points out, the segregation of the races was really a political stratagem employed by the emerging Bourbon interests in the South to keep the southern masses divided and southern labor the cheapest in the land. You see, it was a simple thing to keep the poor white masses working for near-starvation wages in the years that followed the Civil War. Why, if the poor white plantation or mill worker became dissatisfied with his low wages, the plantation or mill owner would merely threaten to fire him and hire former Negro slaves and pay him even less. Thus, the southern wage level was kept almost unbearably low.

Toward the end of the Reconstruction era, something very significant happened. (Listen to him) That is what was known as the Populist Movement. (Speak, sir) The leaders of this movement began awakening the poor white masses (Yes, sir) and the former Negro slaves to the fact that they were being fleeced by the emerging Bourbon interests. Not only that, but they began uniting the Negro and white masses (Yeah) into a voting bloc that threatened to drive the Bourbon interests from the command posts of political power in the South.

To meet this threat, the southern aristocracy began immediately to engineer this development of a segregated society. (Right) I want you to follow me through here because this is very important to see the roots of racism and the denial of the right to vote. Through their control of mass media, they revised the doctrine of white supremacy. They saturated the thinking of the poor white masses with it, (Yes) thus clouding their minds to the real issue involved in the Populist Movement. They then directed the placement on the books of the South of laws that made it a crime for Negroes and whites to come together as equals at any level. (Yes, sir) And that did it. That crippled and eventually destroyed the Populist Movement of the nineteenth century.

If it may be said of the slavery era that the white man took the world and gave the Negro Jesus, then it may be said of the Reconstruction era that the southern aristocracy took the world and gave the poor white man Jim Crow. (Yes, sir) He gave him Jim Crow. (Uh huh) And when his wrinkled stomach cried out for the food that his empty pockets could not provide, (Yes, sir) he ate Jim Crow, a psychological bird that told him that no matter how bad off he was, at least he was a white man, better than the black man. (Right sir) And he ate Jim Crow. (Uh huh) And when his undernourished children cried out for the necessities that his low wages could not provide, he showed them the Jim Crow signs on the buses and in the stores, on the streets and in the public buildings. (Yes, sir) And his children, too, learned to feed upon Jim Crow, (Speak) their last outpost of psychological oblivion. (Yes, sir)."

Dr. King, Address at the Conclusion of the Selma to Montgomery March, 25 March 1965

http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentse...

alanwatts··on Snapchat Passes Twitter in Daily Usage
Please reread the first sentence.
alanwatts··on Snapchat Passes Twitter in Daily Usage
Knowing that what you say will be private(ish) and not be kept on historical record (at least not in public -- I assume Snapchat saves everything) can lead one to be more open, honest, and up-front in their communication.

Whereas writing something which will be kept on the public historical record for all to see forever leads to both conscious and subconscious self-censorship and can be misleading when trying to "read back who you have been 10 years ago" because what you wrote may not have been what you were really thinking.

The ephemeral nature of the spoken word and the historical nature of the written word both have their advantages and disadvantages.

alanwatts··on Snapchat Passes Twitter in Daily Usage
>You can post pretty shamelessly the little things you're up to all day to your story, knowing it will be gone in 24 hours, keeping your feed really clean.

Snapchat is ephemeral and more private, like the spoken word, and unlike pretty much all other social media that I know of. It is an interesting concept, people feel more open to share certain things when they know it will fade away soon after rather than be on historical record .

alanwatts··on DeepText: Facebook's text understanding engine
The magic of Facebook is the billion+ users on it. Do those people use Facebook because it offers some unique service which no one else can or does, or because it went viral and everyone jumped on the bandwagon?
alanwatts··on Moving Forward on Basic Income
I read the first bit of Mises theory, which is full of fallacy from the start:

>The problem referred to is that of how to distribute resources rationally in an economy. The free market solution is the price mechanism, wherein people individually have the ability to decide how a good or service should be distributed based on their willingness to give money for it.

This is a catch-22. Normal people are given a highly limited amount of money, the supply of which is arbitrarily dictated by a handful of bankers. So the ultimate power of setting prices lies with them. This is explicitly outlined as one of the three main objectives of the Federal Reserve: maintaining stable prices.

>The price conveys embedded information about the abundance of resources as well as their desirability which in turn allows, on the basis of individual consensual decisions, corrections that prevent shortages and surpluses;

If this were true, there wouldn't be 4-6 empty houses for every homeless person, or starving people when vast surpluses of food exist around the corner. There is no such thing as a "free market" and yet the ideology of one persists as a way to prevent any such innovation.

alanwatts··on Moving Forward on Basic Income
>There's no way to efficiently allocate resources absent a price mechanism

Obviously math and science would be involved. However, the dollar is not created based on a mathematical or scientific standard, it is created by a handful of oligarchs based on closed source subjective speculation and confidence, "voodoo economics", and the broken window fallacy.

>how are you supposed to acquire all these resources in the first place?

The resources don't need to be acquired, they're already sitting there. They just need to be shared. So empathy for humanity is where the real deficit lies, and one of the main reasons for this is the fallacy of Malthusian-Darwinian economic ideology.

alanwatts··on Moving Forward on Basic Income
This was the biggest move which Dr. King was calling for in his fight for civil rights, a year before he was assassinated.

>We must rapidly begin [applause], we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered. A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. On the one hand we are called to play the Good Samaritan on life’s roadside, but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho Road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life’s highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar. It comes to see than an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. [applause]

alanwatts··on Facebook and Twitter pledge to remove hate speech within 24 hours
The reason Comcast is a monopoly is because if it wasn't, 21rst century networks would be like 19th century networks? Nice try, Comcast.
alanwatts··on The Untold Story Behind Saudi Arabia’s U.S. Treasury Holdings
The current US Secretary of the Treasury is the most influential member of the IMF, with 16.66% of the total voting power (Jacob Lew) [1]. He was promoted to his current posts shortly after banking on the 2008 economic collapse with Citi.

[1]https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx#3

alanwatts··on Facebook and Twitter pledge to remove hate speech within 24 hours
>Every dictatorship has ultimately strangled in the web of repression it wove for its people, making mistakes that could not be corrected because criticism was prohibited.

-RFK, "Value of Dissent" (21 March 1968)

The problem is that of blindness and group think. Every major advancement of human rights has been against the "terms of service" and were extremely uncomfortable ideas for the majority of people.

Getting your feelings hurt every now and again can be used as a catalyst for personal and moral growth just like exercising causes pain but increases health.

alanwatts··on Facebook and Twitter pledge to remove hate speech within 24 hours
Let's follow that logic: the internet infrastructure is owned by private companies (i.e. Comcast), so shouldn't Comcast be able to censor and throttle anything that goes over their network?
alanwatts··on Making the Grades
>If they aren't giving an education and people can still get jobs "for years" what exactly is the point of $200k education again?

Its purpose is more symbolic than realistic. Symbols are easily faked. An example of this is how Frank Abagnale was able to fake having gone to medical, law, and flight school, among many other things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Abagnale

← PreviousPage 4 of 13Next →