al2o3cr

Stigma balls in your mouth, more like

    AI That Hallucinated A Cop Into A Frog

He got better

    Before we go any further, it’s worth acknowledging that we do not have
    the moral authority to propose a technical definition of AGI. 

It's always great when an article starts by declaring the author's incompetence.

     According to AI, no such study exists.

Congratulations, you finally found somebody even stupider than you to talk to

Welcome to Elmo-land where a mission:

with a spacecraft that has never been orbited

that will need to be refueled in-orbit, which has never been done

"crewed" by autonomous robots which have only been demoed with remote operation

is "50/50" for happening within 11 months

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight

The only winning strategy: get him to sell nukes to the other side. He'll bullshit them out of billions for years and fail to deliver. See also the Boring Company, "Full Self Driving", and the Mars mission.

Shows up as a brand-new user, opens by posting a link to a low-effort blog post, gets bounced.

Sounds like Reddit working as designed, TBH

Link is broken - correct link:

https://vexjoy.com/posts/everything-that-can-be-deterministi...

Where math?

For instance: an explicit form of the T^info term (introduced on page 4) for a physical system.

Without that, this is just meaningless LLM drippings.

The "proof-10m.json" file claims to have only needed 256MB RSS (line 13)

It's an amazing coincidence how, despite all the other proof files including 10+ decimal places for their memory statistics, the 100m case somehow came out EXACTLY at integer values! And somehow heap_growth_percent was zero, despite the heap starting at 50 and ending at 3100...

The "proof-100m-official.json" also omits all leaf hashes in favor of referencing a file ".tmp/leaves-100000000.bin" which is not included with the "proof".

    You mention the "uncharged case", but ordinary matter is not mathematically neutral. 

YOUR CODE assumes that it is, when it passes "q": 0 for four of the six objects.

For the other two, it passes "q": 1. Let's look at what it does then:

    L_src is much much smaller than Le, by roughly a factor of (mass / mPL)^2

    The calculation of lambda_a uses the electron mass even when calculating for a proton

    For the given objects, metric_factor is negligible.

    ai_unified = c^2 * (alpha * hbar / (me_kg * c)) / r^2 = alpha * (hbar * c) / (me_kg * r^2)

    but alpha = k*e^2 / (hbar * c)

    so ai_unified = k * e^2 / (me_kg * r^2) + small correction of O((mass / mPL)^2)

That's exactly the formula used for acc_coloumb in the code. Also interesting to note the "Coulomb acceleration" for a proton is calculated by dividing the electric force by the mass of the ELECTRON somehow.

As for "Phase 2"? The program's output doesn't even agree with the implementation about the formula being used.

Numerology and LLM slop. Meaningless.

Consider the "calculation" for ai_unified for an uncharged case:

     L_src = m hbar / (c*mp^2). 
     Expand and simplify and get L_src = m G / c^2

     L_lim = w * L_src = 2 m G / c^2. Also the value of rs.

     metric_factor is irrelevant, as both ai_gr and ai_unified are divided by it since L_lim = rs

     ai_unified = (c^2 * L_src) / (radius^2 * metric_factor). Expand L_src and get ai_unified = m G / (radius^2 * metric_factor)

This is IDENTICAL to the formula used for ai_gr when there is no charge. Presenting "0% difference" like it is a result is sloppy ignorant bullshitting at best and deliberate fraud at worst.

    On Wednesday, a group of 22 Republican Senators sent an open letter
    to the president, arguing that marijuana use would mean that 
    "we cannot re-industrialise America".

Whatever they smoked to make this statement make sense should DEFINITELY be illegal

Link is broken, correct version:

https://deadline.com/2025/12/youtube-terminates-screen-cultu...

I'm sure your LLM's parents are very impressed

The docs mention that space for overwritten variable-sized values in the buffer is not reclaimed:

    The overridden space is never recovered, causing buffer size
    to grow indefinitely.

Is the garbage at least zeroed? Otherwise seems like it could "leak" overwritten values when sending whole buffers via memcpy

A lot of unparsed Markdown left in this document - things surrounded with double-asterisks etc

This is word salad. The LLM doesn't "understand" it either.

Check out r/LLMPhysics on Reddit to watch LLM-zombies try to convince themselves they and the robot have solved physics with a half-dozen pages of misformatted LaTeX

Gonna take a long time for Benji to build that shelf starting from planting the trees to turn into lumber and mining the iron ore to make the tools & nails.

Sure thing. If we take him seriously, that means he's lost track of what's real and what's make-believe. Give him a grippy sock vacation until he can remember.

Shorter Bezos: "Millions of Americans need to get shafted so I can have another bajillion dollars"

Naming a law after yourself gets you an instant 10x "probably a crank" modifier. Chill out.

What is F_bond? Section 2.1 describes it as "the characteristic interaction energy of the initial state (kJ/mol)" but that's not standard terminology.

The exponent n is introduced, but then immediately assumed to be 1 with a hand wave to "optimal agreement is obtained" with that choice.

This asserts values of k without any evidence of where they came from. Some of them are "corrected" with unsupported statements like "Normalization relative to the noble gas reference yields a value 10x higher".

Section 3.1 argues that k=1.00 for helium, then section 3.4 instead declares k=2.21 because of "quantum mechanical effects predominating" with no additional explanation.

You can't get this published because it's vaguely-defined numerology puked out by an LLM.

Yeah, and monkeys may fly out of my butt

"Silent war"? If there's one thing that over-enthusiastic advocates for both things share, it's the inability to be silent.

Considering CS skins as "investments" is as moronic as considering rare Happy Meal toys as "investments" and getting angry when the company makes more

It's amazing how many Italian dictators had biscuits named after them.

You've got the Garibaldi of course, you've got your Bourbon, and you've got your Peek Freens Trotsky assortment!

"We alone could think of 'have a second memory bank', they must have STOLEN OUR IDEA!!!!!"

I'm investing eleventy trillion dollars in AI infrastructure!

(note: I'm actually announcing that if I somehow had eleventy trillion dollars that's what I would do. That counts, since Anthropic doesn't have the $50b either)

    SpaceX fans quickly began calling for a rescue mission

So nobody of importance has called for this. Did somebody at El Reg have a quota of Musk-glazing they needed to fill?

    We passed the Turing Test years ago 

Only if "the author became so stupid they couldn't tell the difference" counts.