Sorry, not buying the “security state” == “antichrist” angle, and if I did I don’t think PT would oppose it - looks like he’s trying to build it
Sure thing. If we take him seriously, that means he's lost track of what's real and what's make-believe. Give him a grippy sock vacation until he can remember.
Or it means that we can't understand that the symbolic can be realer than the mere "real" - and offer a much handier practical handle on things.