63 karma · joined October 14, 2012
What is this doing here, danso?
See http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/6359?fg=&man=&lfacet=... and http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/1866
“The trachea was never a problem,” Dr. Macchiarini said Sunday.
On some level that may be true. I think the primary level though is that you're only as good as your product. Smart pitches alone get you nowhere. If you don't have a solid, functional product (and one that meets a true market need) the pitch is irrelevant. Nobody buys ideas. Good products sell themselves.
But we don't know this is true for Apple because Weev didn't try to responsibly/ethically disclose his findings. He boasted about it on IRC and then to a reporter.
So maybe Apple would have sued him if he tried to bring it to their attention. Still, he could have disclosed it to them anonymously.
> Because the fastest way to guarantee this stops sooner than later is leak every address publicly with information about every error AT&T made and let civil suits from pissed-off customers fry them.
I don't know whether you're a programmer or not, but one thing you learn very quickly when you are one is that programmers are humans and humans make mistakes. Bugs happen all the time, and no one wants to be on the receiving end of some kid who finds ones and takes rubbing it in your face as his divine mandate. Dumping all the info you pull from a hack is neither responsible nor ethical. Doing so dons you with the blackest of hats and destroys your reputation to all except like-minded sociopaths.
> No, then it'd still be broken and nobody would know.
If it's broken and nobody knows, is it still broken? I do understand where you're coming from though.
I can agree with you that maybe a restorative justice-based system would work better. It would be interesting to see how that worked in practice. I've always thought the prison system was too easy and that prisoners should be put to work in factories and farms. However, I don't feel like using weev as the poster-child for the restorative justice agenda.
I am a thief. I relentless pirate movies, television shows, and music. I do so because I know my chances of getting caught are next to zero.
I'm sure there are some who think that way and by the numbers hobs references it's probably a large number. Maybe a restorative justice based system could change this? Either way, I don't feel like using weev as the poster-child for the restorative justice agenda.
Are you suggesting they should go unpunished?
> It doesn't appear to deter people from committing crimes.
The suggestion that the threat of imprisonment does not act as a deterrent to criminal activity is absurd.
> It certainly doesn't help criminals rehabilitate and become productive members of society.
Do you really not see "I'm here because I screwed up. I probably should try to not screw up in the future." going through the mind of prisoners as they sit in their cells?