1,297 karma · joined April 5, 2015
Was there something that diminutives these claims?
-ancient proverb
Also: our usernames are oddly similar!
If you’re claiming it’s a big step back for productivity, I’d argue that phones and tablets are devices of consumption, few things of worth are produced on a phone or tablet.
The most recent job the hiring manager saw my post on HN: who’s looking to be hired, and they just reached out directly.
I wonder if there were some vice that degraded eyesight, that LASIK would be frowned upon.
The narrative plays well to the general public because it’s a weight loss drug, which is seen as vain/ non-virtuous (even though it is, indeed, healthier to live life at a more modest BMI than most the population currently has).
If this were not clickbait they would be focused on breaking a new story, but there’s no story to be had, just “out of the millions of people who have taken this drug, we were able to find 2 that are less than shining examples of wellness”.
The individuals highlighted appear to have underlying conditions that were aggravated by drugs, but these drugs have been in the market for 15 years, they’re not exactly untested.
It’s been immensely helpful; I’m sure there other ones that work well too but this one does everything I need.
I think it’s more like “I’m working on a bunch of stuff I already know, I have all the designs and business logic clearly identified, and my colleagues and I are all on the same page about how to work together so I’m really productive” vs “this codebase I just adopted is completely unreadable, the designs change every 3 days and the other teams I’m interacting with are adversarial”.
People aren’t 10x engineers, situations are.
And how are they claiming they lost money due to skip lagging? If anything they’d gain money on the smaller amount of fuel needed for the second leg because he wasn’t on it.
The word kafkaesque becomes more relevant every day.