Do you have relevant expertise in this topic?
37 karma · joined June 17, 2024
It's curiosity, it's learning, it's looking for an explanation.
That's exactly the kind of comment that deserves to be here.
>[...] who doesn't have any relevant expertise,
Is that a requirement to comment on this thread?
Do you fulfill that requirement you brought in?
But to cater to your question, no, he did not send me an email.
He did not have to do anything, I was the one who approached God.
I hope one day you are able to understand this and live in peace with others who do not wish you any bad. You're not a teenager anymore.
"US Economy"
"US Job Market"
"US Military"
"US Policy"
And many other examples ...
But now that I read about it, when you use it as adjective you have to write as "U.S.".
If you want to throw the whole argument to the trash because it's missing two dots, well ... up to you.
Even if 9 out of 10 of cardinals, priests and worshippers were crooked, my faith in Christ wouldn't move one inch (2.54cm); it might actually become even greater.
I think there is a profound difference on how two different kinds of people approach religion.
On one side, I've never given much care to what the "social opinion" of something is in order to engage with it or not. My choice to follow Christ is rooted on myself, not on what I'm told to be right or wrong.
On the other, I can understand people who choose to associate/dissociate from specific groups/trends based on what they hear on the news/radio/etc... and I think that's completely valid as well. There was a even time in our past where having this trait was a desirable thing!
But what you found further reinforces my point. Thanks.
Source, you?
I could argue the opposite. If your purported "exception" applies to 80%+ of the global population, a minimal dash of common sense would make me think that's the rule, not the other way around.
Your "exception"s are quite loose, pal!
The other commenter on this sub-thread just gave you another example of that.
Then your parents have the final say.
What you're saying is:
1. You tried to end your life.
2. Because of the intervention of other people, most likely your family, that didn't happen.
3. You wish that didn't happen and instead would prefer to be dead.
Right?
Not a different question, not an essay, not hand-waving, just focus on that very concrete question.
>What situations in classical physics are non-deterministic?
Is "statistical mechanics" contained within "classical physics"?
Yes or no? No need for a nonsensical philosophical essay.
If you were able to perfectly balance the ball on a perfectly constructed dome, blah blah, would the ball stay static indefinitely or would it start rolling down some arbitrary path?
Sorry, I didn't take my crazy pills today.
To me it is very clear that the question involves physics from the start.
I am very interested on this as well, feel free to reach out, email in profile.
I am actually advocating against abuse and corruption in academia, that's a swamp that really needs to be drained.
Do you understand how much money a hundred billion dollars is?
The flu makes us lose five "generational cohorts" every year, then.
Non-profits have a mission that has to be aligned with a public/social benefit.
No amount of structuring would help you if it turns out that your activities benefit a private individual/organization instead of whatever public benefit you wrote when setting up the non-profit.
All it takes if a judge ruling that [1] is happening, and then it's over for you and all your derived entities, subsidiaries, whatever-you-set-up-thinking-you-would-outsmart-the-irs. Judges can see through your bullshit, they do this 100s of times, year after year.
And also, "oh, but we wanted to do this since the beginning" only digs you a deeper hole, lmao. Do they not have common sense?
I'm surprised that @sama, whose major talent is manipulat... sorry "social engineering", greenlit this approach.
1. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organiz...
I have some large files stored in R2 and a 50Gbps interface to the world.
curl to Linode's speed test is ~200MB/sec.
curl to R2 is also ~200MB/sec.
I'm only getting 1Gbps but given that Linode's speed is pretty much the same I would think the bottleneck is somewhere else. Dually, R2 gives you at least 1Gbps.
"Oh but you can't compare a paragraph to a whole movie script!"
Sure, just apply the same procedure recursively, stop at a depth where you're satisfied, see [2].
Bear in mind I've only spent like 10 minutes and a negligible amount of money. Now imagine you have a year and a budget of 10MUSD to come up with the best movie script you can create with the help of AI.
It really is only a matter of time ...
1: https://chatgpt.com/share/673bc781-0318-8003-a555-5ea4ea1463...
2: https://chatgpt.com/share/673bc976-0a24-8003-ab8e-11c7800527...
Lol. 99% of patents are cruft. And I'd be wildly surprised if revenue from patent licensing at the companies you worked at was more than a single digit percentage; mayyyyyybeeee Qualcomm but am too lazy atm. to dive through their financial statements.
Edit: I was off by 2%. See [1].
1: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenkey/2017/11/13/in-todays...
They'll be out of business very soon!
/s
Called it a couple weeks ago → https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41884821.
Some still think "OpenAI has no moat", keep on beating that horse, lol.
* Agreed by both parties to be the protocol they'll use
* Used for "representation" (assuming we mean the same by that, if not, please clarify)
>So if you're using Firefox
I jumped ship ten years ago; but I've heard you guys are doing quite well?
>I'm dangerously clueless about real-world JS.
Agree.
Disclosure: I'm @moralestapia but my laptop ran out of battery and this is my backup account, lol.
One could argue "well, vote with your wallet then", but there's overwhelming evidence showing that people choose cheap over any other quality of a product, also, sometimes there's not even the possibility of a choice to be made.
What solution would you propose, then, around this?