(parent: read username :))
790 karma · joined April 10, 2011
(parent: read username :))
Do you want to clarify your phrasing or is that actually how you operate? :(
I will offer one nit here, which is that I always start my commit messages with one-line summaries; this makes it really easy to scan commits (and git is tooled to do this!)
Growing up Spiderweb games were some of my all time favorites and I'd love one on the go.
Architects and architectural styles are much more concerned with their particular artistic vision, and status signaling within their tribe, than with whether their buildings are pleasant to live within. (See: brutalism, for the worst case, but this applies widely.)
The more practical realities force architects to abandon their pet styles and build efficient places, the better. I have to live there; they don’t.
Pass. Natural light (and tons of it!) are a hard requirement for anywhere I actually want to work. (Besides light and airy spaces being generally pleasant, I have mild SAD.)
In any case, I'd rather use modern air conditioning, which is stunningly efficient. It also actually produces temperatures I can live in. They don't quote actual interior temperatures (or humidities!) but I'll bet their "acceptable" is 78F+. Anything north of 70 and I am a sweaty mess. (If you're cold, put on a sweater; I can't exactly strip in the office and you wouldn't want to sit next to me anyway!)
Complaints about air conditioning are mostly a form of modern self-flagellation. If you're not suffering, you're not doing enough for Gaia. Cost/benefit calculations simply don't enter into it (if they did, someone might point out that eliminating all cooling whatsoever would not even move the needle on US energy. Consider https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/4/13/1526860... and https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=1174&t=1, from which you can see that cooling is 9% of electricity, which is perhaps 38% of total energy usage.)
The nice thing about virtual memory is that it's, well, virtual. It costs you almost nothing until you've touched it. (Fun exercise for the reader: measure the kernel overhead for an unused 1 TiB VMA.) But creating huge spaces--that terabyte mmap wasn't theoretical--that stay untouched is hugely algorithmically useful, especially for things like malloc implementations.
Why does it bother people? Two reasons. First is mlock to avoid swap. This is solvable in much better ways--I'm a fan of disabling swap in many cases anyway. Second is that, absent cgroups, it's difficult to put hard limits on memory usage in Linux. So people, looking under the streetlight, put limits on virtual usage, even though that's not what they care about limiting! Then they get angry when you break it. My refrain here, as in many cases (see for example measuring process CPU time spent in kernel mode): "X is impossible" doesn't justify Y unless Y correctly solves the problem X does.
(I spent years in charge of a major memory allocator so this is a battle I've fought too many times.)
Bezos is smart enough to know that the problem with Seattle homelessness has nothing to do with access to money. The city spends like water on the homeless, and we see nothing from it (which makes the spending a complete success for its intended beneficiaries, the bureaucrats in charge of the money.) We need a new policy to deal with them, and with this we won't get it.
L1 caches are generally virtually indexed for exactly this reason: to allow a L1 cache read to happen in parallel with the TLB lookup. (They're also usually, I believe, physically tagged, so we have to check for collisions at some point, but making sure there's no side channel information at that point is, obviously given recent events, hard.)
We aren't at full lightspeed latencies ram technologies, but we're closer than you may realize, and it's unlikely we can do substantially better any time soon without revolutionary advances.
Yeah, that's not what makes a man "high quality" by the data and revealed preferences online. Attractiveness does. The men any woman wants to see on a dating site online don't have their time wasted, because they get responses to whatever they write.
Not "you discovered that they did, in fact, cause cancer"; just discovering a way that it is physically possible for them to do so.
This dates back to Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect: it's easy to show (and the only thing consistent with all of 20th century physics!) that light can only cause molecular damage if individual photons carry enough energy, which in turn only happens if the radiation is of sufficiently high frequency (like UV light, X-Rays, or gamma radiation.) Any radio signal from a cell phone isn't. End of discussion.
Unless you are being actually cooked by a microwave, your cell phone does not and cannot cause cancer.
"Radiation" is a scary word for non experts, but the California Health Department should know better.
Wildly incorrectly. I live in WA and it overestimates my sales tax deduction by a factor of ten.
Since I mostly hate my insurer and want to help them towards bankruptcy by extracting as much coverage from my fixed premium as possible, I have no objection to using these coupons if they'd help me and I felt like an expensive drug choice was better for me, though it's not come up for almost any drug I've needed.
Though I do need new epi-pens; maybe I should look for one while I still can!
[1] https://www.propublica.org/article/are-copay-coupons-actuall...
I believe the core difference here between QCD and QED (the classical perturbative QFT) is that QED has a very small coupling constant (it's the fine structure constant, so ~1/137) whereas QCD has a large one (comparable to or greater than one.) It turns out that a perturbative expansion is effectively in powers of the coupling constant, so QED expansions converge rapidly...and QCD expansions converge not at all.
In either case, the problem is coming up with a reasonably accurate reference class. At least in my case, I'm not well represented by the BLS breakdowns (which underestimate what I can expect to get by a factor of about four.)
The Stack Overflow approach, using industry-specific features (developer-friendly keywords/job titles/languages) is definitely smarter, though still wildly insufficient. (It's only off by a factor of about three.)
Months later, I opened my computer's DVD drive for once, and discovered the reason: my sister, a professional classical singer, had sent me one of her recordings, and I had put it in the computer to listen and forgotten about it for the next year.
Somehow the game was--from its original on-cd release--assuming the proper soundtrack was on track N of the CD, instead of the Steam install.
Remarkably simple in the end, but a very baffling bug at first.
In particular I'm thinking of doctors. I care a lot about having exactly the right doctor (a good one, a specialist, etc) much of the time, but there are many medical services where I simply need anyone competent to pass their boards with a prescription pad. (I have been taking the same three or four prescriptions since I was six for a few common ailments--I don't need someone to tell me special information about albuterol.)
Unless Trump has specific relevance to this dispute, which I don't think he does, bringing him up is going to just add heat and fuel, not understanding. I think the mods would rather you didn't.
Just a thought. :)