100% agree with regulation. That’s why US trade policy is the main cause of the decline. It should reflect regulatory arbitrage. It’s utterly pointless to save the environment in the US and poison it in China.
340 karma · joined November 10, 2015
100% agree with regulation. That’s why US trade policy is the main cause of the decline. It should reflect regulatory arbitrage. It’s utterly pointless to save the environment in the US and poison it in China.
If automation was the problem, then US would be price competitive on goods with China. Somehow US automation is only good enough to eliminate jobs in the US, but not good enough to compete with cheap labor in China.
Bitcoin is just one settlement layer. There is no reason for my day to day transactions to settle there. My day to day payments can be settlement on a chain with much higher throughput and faster finality and different security assumptions.
There is also no reason why I can't lend my funds to 100m user credit cards directly without a middleman through software either.
So whats the cost comparison of moving $100,000 out of China into the the US via bitcoin vs the traditional banking system?
only 2 nodes away from failing :)
In comparison the search engine market is 170 billion. If a google sized company or decentralized network could reduce the 2 trillion global spend on payments to 170b, that would be fantastic regardless of how much it spends on preventing double spends.
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/financi...
If you want a decentralized TON, get all the investors together and launch a genesis block with the open source code. That’s basically what EOS did.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1729650/000095017218...
On their own discounts are not illegal.
I think what’s obvious is that the network is not truly decentralized and depends on telegram and investors expect to profit from telegrams work on the network. So they should probably file an s-1 and follow the blockstack route.
What would have been ironic, is if TON was truly decentralized and independent of telegram than the network would have been launched anyways.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1729650/000095017218...
What this action threatens is the SAFT model. It’s not clear what steps TG needs to take to disassociate themselves from the launch such that TON is decentralized and no longer a security. Or if they need to file a reg-a or s-1 before launch.
[edit for clarity]
One challenge is that bpf upstreaming is much harder. We had to add support for relocations, spilling, multiple return values, and a few other things that might not be needed by the C bpf folks.
If they are going to build it and hand it of to border patrol, then Congress should fund it with the border patrols budget. Which they won’t, because this is as useless as a physical wall. So funding it with the money taxpayers allocated for the DoD is the definition of corruption.
Soviet Union used the army to police immigration as well.
This whole thing smacks of corruption.
Do we have an objective set of morals that are above the law? Was the Soviet government evil? What about any corporation that is not carbon negative?
This is a question of ethics. What is the right behavior to resist evil?
For example, you could follow our own governments guide :) https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/...
Do you want to spend months at a time in a soda can that can explode at any moment surrounded by vacuum? Or be a modern day bard?