408 karma · joined February 22, 2009
Formerly: VP Engineering at Upverter in Toronto. Formerly: Founder at algoanywhere / CTO @ 500px
Background: - Engineering Science via UToronto - Not-so-amateur computational economist, mathematical physicist, bioinformatician.
I think it's very possible to jump ahead of this effect, but the capital outlay would be impressive, and as a society we apparently aren't permitted to accomplish Big Things anymore, so it's likely we stay in this weird bit of the function for a long while.
It's not bull shit, it's just hard.
(I'm not typically this pedantic... I just think viruses have particularly interesting information dynamics and it's really weird to me when applied as a metaphor outside of where that would make sense.)
Amen.
goto generally becomes a problem when suddenly everything is short-circuiting everywhere and you can't see where control's getting passed off to.
http://blog.upverter.com/static/images/hardware_ecosystem.jp...
[ disclosure: I'm an Upvertor ]
Has there been any consideration of making a semantic version of the equations involved? The great thing about having this on the web, is I could easily see myself maintaining links in long calculations to various formulas as the authority.
(Also: what's the font in the SVG images? It's great!)
Not just for kids anymore.
Additionally, other posters have been right about ethnic Russians leaving the Baltics, which is something governments have actually been trying to encourage anyhow. The Soviets had hugely increased the number of ethnic Russians in the Baltics, nearly to the point of overtaking the native populations.
Wikipedia has a partial graph for Latvia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Ethnic_gr...
If anyone's working in this space, I'd love to chat with people familiar this stuff.
Edit: arXiv PDF preprint is at http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0404335.pdf
When designing (evolving, inventing) rules, regulations, policy, exceptions, limitations, audits, checks, balances, the bureaucracy's princes seem to ignore the bigger picture of what it's all become: a mess.
It's not just government systems either. There's a reason why people joke about their phone bills being difficult to understand. Same goes for most utilities.
Now, once you have an incoherent, contradictory, thousand page mishmash set of rules, every engineer worthy of the title is going to stay as far away as possible. So, the whole mess gets dumped on an army of coders from a big consultancy.
Perhaps instead of focusing on the useless software written to fit a pile of inane rules, people could focus on the economic and operational benefits of redoing the entire policy regime with a zen-shaped comb.
Software is an enabler. It's actually covered-up a lot of really awful decision-making. The US tax code could never have become what it is if developers hadn't been able to consistently keep up with crazy new patches to implement it: nobody could possibly manage it by hand.
I would imagine this varies dramatically by industry. I know several of the biosciences, for example, do require a lot of specialized people, equipment and tons of cash... Many of the areas we're seeing disrupted by startups are areas where you'd hit diminishing returns (from, say, more equipment / capital) rather quickly.
It's meant as a reminder to the obligation you have to society not to cut corners on safety, and that your responsibilities to your employer do not outweigh those you have to Canadians generally.
I hadn't made the connection to the surge of effort in law and finance, but it's a convincing argument.
The real question, then, is: Can we return the western economies to an optimistic-deterministic point of view? It would require really reframing a lot of public debate - or perhaps taking discourse elsewhere from regulated airwaves where the established players seem to worship an utterly indeterminate world view, as evidenced by continuous coverage of uncontrollable events.