Journalist detained at US/Canadian Border
onthemedia.org
onthemedia.org
I wonder, is it that largely this topic does not concern the American public or are there no democratic means to influence the agency?
The border agent has a lot of power and his /her judgment is trusted. Of course a US citizen has the right to get in but they hold you for hours and hours based on suspicions. Just a cavity type search for your luggage will set you back a few hours and I suppose they can justify it with "he was acting nervously.". Go ahead and dispute that
You hear about it like five times a year, and millions of people cross the border every year. The proportion of egregious false positives -- defined as, bad enough for someone to want to write about it -- is vanishingly small. The odds that it'll happen to any given person here, even any given person of the subject minority (brown), is so small it might as well be zero, from the perspective of a brain that's bad at dealing with small numbers [1].
It's hard enough to get people who read a tech site to care. Now try getting everyone to.
[1] http://lesswrong.com/lw/6h1/people_neglect_small_probability...
I am, and I assumed this article was referring to the U.S. doing the holding not Canada. I feel like the title is appropriate actually, saying "journalist detained at U.S. border" would be less informative imo.
That's just my opinion though, perhaps I am not properly conceptualizing the matter from yours/others viewpoints.