The groups you mentioned have little to do with India. Some of the groups responsible in India were dealt with and some are still active mostly outside now.
3,560 karma · joined June 24, 2016
My point was there was sufficient Hindu diaspora outside but it has not been involved with violence of religious nature and are mostly considered model minorities.
The problem in India is well known, and it is an actual issue there. Although, I will add all of the events you mentioned have precursor events to them as well; not that that justifies anything.
There is sufficient Hindu diaspora outside, so this comment seems extremely uncalled for.
Engine: yes, they had a massive advantage
Driver: Not sure, from 2019 onwards Verstappen has probably been the better driver but he didn't have the car, but we will never know this.
Not being able to have the best car was not Newey's fault. When the turbo hybrid era came in, Mercedes absolutely nailed the engine which gave them a massive advantage. Ferrari also had a decent engine some of those years.
Meanwhile Red Bull engine providers Renault and Honda struggled to put up an engine that was on level ground to the Mercedes one. There is only so much a person like Newey can do when other engines are vastly superior.
> Unlike China, US is not an adversary of India and US didn't kill Indian soldiers just two years back. So it makes sense they would go after Tiktok.
Unlike China, US is not an adversary of India and US didn't kill Indian soldiers just two years back. So it makes sense they would go after Tiktok.
The harm is just not espionage, it is also manipulation of sentiment by propoganda.
Also, I am not really sure with all the equivalence to Meta in this thread. Sure, Meta has things to be criticized about but if one thinks West has threat from Meta on the same level as Tiktok, that seems delusional.
As much as I don't like for profit companies monetising this, I am not sure if I know of a better path to innovation.
We have so many smart devices that can record so much data, and it doesn't even have to be auto recording. If you had a headache, if you can mark that and over time based on a pattern it can recommend you to see a specialist or get some tests done.
I am not sure what you mean by commercialised.
There is huge scope in healthcare for automation, pre-emptive diagnosis and raising the bar for precision.
It is mostly going to be done by a company with good AI chops, I would put my money on Google, from what I have heard about their efforts.
Rather than fixing the issue with moderation and editing biases creeping into Wikipedia, they seem to be focussing on being more profligate with their money.
I still prefer to signup using a spam email address.
Even the initial sanction shock has petered out as it seems oil and gas sales have been going well
Funnily enough India being a country is exactly like the idea of China being a country.
The difference between the two nations is China having one of their golden periods in the recent past which allowed land territory to be mostly unified under common rule, pre civil war. Post PRC formation, there has been much more effort to homogenize the identity of a Chinese person.
Also, the idea of China and Japan being one country is more similar to say India and Indonesia being one country just because one of them influenced the culture of the other in the past.
Some % of people, yes. But not everyone leaves. As long as enough brilliant people remain and there can be economic and scientific progress breaking the shackles of a millennia of rule, things can become right. These things are slow and take time though.
All these feed rankings are complex combinations of features, models coupled with weights and filters. On top of this abuse detection layers are added.
Unless Musk is planning to open source user data to show what all the "scores" and "features" for all the entities are and how they were reached to, this will make no sense. The whole argument against some people being downranked has been, why me? Just writing a whitepaper to tell the general methodology, is not going to make that go away.
On top of that, exposing every vector through which you measure and stop abuse, will just allow for more sophisticated abuse.
I said 90s too which is a gap of 20 years. I skipped 00s because I don't recall the data completely now, but I will check.
> In terms of trends in the 20th century, there's been a clear noticeable jump after the current government came in, which is what should matter.
00s had clearly more terror incidents in India than 10s. There were several major metros and big cities hit with blasts every year. So, one form of communal violence has definitely gone down. Even early half of 10s had much more of these than the latter half. There is a whole Wiki article that lists these incidents, you can have a look at that.
It does, but I don't know how this can be even changed.
The Indian judicial system is broken and even the laws are very vague so law enforcement can always choose to act on them.
India has needed judicial reform from a long time but it hasn't been forthcoming.
Worse, every successive government makes laws more vague to suit themselves.
Guardian is as infallible as any other media organisation run by humans who have their own biases.
People speaking opposing viewpoints are silenced in China as well, no?
The only difference is that in case of India, either the courts or the public through agitations can intervene which might lead to instability.
But I had a question about this. Do VCs looking for data and analysis of a country largely rely on foreign press or read an assortment of local media as well?