196 karma · joined April 9, 2013
Seems the Supreme Court disagrees with your opinion as well [1].
[1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/17/supreme-court-silen...
You're right about it being the norm. The only way to stop it is to sue them. it's literally the only thing they understand.
send a "Hi how are you" letter to the NSA chief, naming him as a party, with an affidavit stating that the NSA does, in fact, have information on you. Give him 10 days to rebut it. Then give him a second letter, acknowledging his fault/acquiescence to the affidavit. then 10 days after that, send a third notice cementing his agreement to the affidavit's truth.
THEN you go do a FOIA request. Include your paperwork with the FOIA request. They can't refuse, because they'd have to contradict your private agreement with the NSA Chief first. if they do refuse, you now have legal recourse in (Secret) courts, because the NSA will now be proven to have obstructed process.
Oracle was the name of the software database Larry Ellison, Bob Miner and Ed Oats created, named after the CIA project they all worked on together [1]. Imagine a world where Edward Snowden got excited about the NSA surveillance, and dorked out on it. That's these guys. Products of the government, who found a way to sell products to the government.
Palantir smells a lot like the same sort of beast, I think. Just my opinion, though.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Corporation#Overall_tim...
By ancient custom the Lord Mayor tenders the City Sword to the Sovereign when she enters the City on state occasions, in token acknowledgement of her overriding authority. The Sovereign touches the sword and, by that gesture, returns it to the Lord Mayor with implied permission to carry it before her whilst she is in the City. Also by ancient custom the permission of the Lord Mayor is sought for the passage of troops through the City, and he receives quarterly, under the Sovereign's sign manual, the password of the Tower of London. As spokesman for the citizens, he is entitled to the right of special access to the Sovereign.
They're essentially a small enclave of "free" [1] people who are allied with Liz, smack dab in the middle of London. Most of the previous Lord Mayors of the City of London were descendants of the people who forced King John to sign the Magna Carta. If, in order to stay in honor of the rules of law, they must grant her a faux sovereignty in their kingdom, it's to do her honor that she would not normally [2] need bestowed on her, in order to keep her allied with The City.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_City#Freedom_of...
[2] (Free people are all "kings" or "sovereign")
Heck with the Chrome fans, lookit all the IE10 zealots in here!
Check out your Argumentum Ad Hominem! [1]
> "shill"
> shill
> "shill"
are you quoting me when you say "shill"? where did I use that word? If I didn't use it, doesn't that make this a Strawman Fallacy? [2]
>I humbly request you to change your mindset from the pre-2000 slashdot era
Perfect example of Association Fallacy [3].
> grow up
followed by an Appeal to emotion! nice! [4]
-
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
>Emscripten isn't currently production-grade software, and it still just compiles down to JavaScript.
took you two sentences to contradict yourself and move the goalposts again. Nowhere were we talking about "production grade".
> I hope you understand that either of those options is still a case of using JavaScript. Are you seriously disputing that?
That's a strawman fallacy. [1]
also, good job with that strawman you put up there. you sure knocked it down real well.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto#II._Pr...
Either way, we're now the USSR, and all the capitalism is on the other side of the ocean.
1) the 30+ year war on drugs, still in effect because the masses believe the illusion that being excessively tough on crime makes for a better society.
2) 12 USC being modified by the Trading With the Enemies Act of 1917 to include "United States Citizen" [1].
3) House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5th 1933 banning gold and silver as currency, ushering in a bankruptcy with the trimmings of Keynesian Economics [2].
4) "9/11 changed everything".
5) Most relevant, NSPD-51 pulling all branches of government under the Executive during Bush II [3], and none of us caring.
Every one of the above is an illusion; handwaving by bureaucrats, that were integral for bringing us to where we are today. Why do you choose to accept/live by the above illusions? because everyone else is?
(Additionally, you may be making an Appeal to Incredulity [4], if you weren't already aware.)
[1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a
[2] http://www.focusoncommerce.net/index_htm_files/LAW%20-%20Hou...
[3] https://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-51.htm
[4] http://www.rationalresponders.com/logical_fallacy_lesson_11_...
But let's blame this on Assange. We can spin this to make him look weaker for trying to help. That will help to minimize the effect both of their efforts have on the world. The "good guys" keep winning, and the "bad guys" keep losing.
God Bless America.
There's also a Firefox Search Add-on [2], for those interested. I combine it with Foobar [3] for a more seamless and chrome-like interface.
[1] http://3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion/
[2] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/duckduckgo-to...