1,909 karma · joined June 5, 2018
> The marketing team’s plan was not to do anything and the night before we opened Facebook to the professional market (anyone with a @microsoft.com, @dell.com, etc…) I emailed TechCrunch to let Michael Arrington know to publish it in the morning. He ended up publishing it that night (I was at Coachella and will never again attend) before the actual product was released in the morning. I immediately notified the e-team and assumed full responsibility.
I guess the guy disagreed with the marketing strategy and did something he thought would be more effective for the company.
Curious on how others weigh in on this. Occasionally you hear stories of startups in the early stage, where some guy goes against some decision that was sub-optimal and it makes all the difference. Are these stories usually just positive selection bias and its better everyone falls in line? Of course, i'm not saying what this guy did was necessarily the right choice either.
Wasn't there some guy who made a local version of some delivery service or something and was profitable on day one? I remember there was a hn link on it that came up a couple of times
For my cs phd I looked mostly at regression problems using deep learning models. I didn't look at this specifically but I still think it would be neat if there is some way to translate the rigid proofs and theorems for classical linear models to deep regression models.
General question, how do you balance between trying to get everyone's feedback vs just being more fast and efficient?especially in the early stages where time is usually pretty critical
try: launch_rocket()
except: explode_rocket()