I haven't seen more attempts at similar things, which doesn't mean they don't exist though. (There were mentions of a similar feature being added when Elon Musk was about to buy Twitter, but just gossips)
9 karma · joined June 25, 2018
I haven't seen more attempts at similar things, which doesn't mean they don't exist though. (There were mentions of a similar feature being added when Elon Musk was about to buy Twitter, but just gossips)
An advantage of having open peer review system is also that this kind of attempts could be detected by tools doing automatic processing of scientific knowledge graphs generated by peer review activity.
This, coupled with verification of users, should be able to minimize the risk quite significantly.
Tools like scite (https://scite.ai/) do automatic processing (NLP) of other papers and determine whether a reference relationships supports or rejects the paper.
Also, http://octopus.ac/ did NLP processing on papers to make a breakdown of them and extract pieces to populate the content on their website, but they seem to have removed the content on their Github since then.
As in VC, amount of success would vary. Smart choices would lead to good outcomes, and all is up to you if you're willing to take such risk and what choices to make.
There are pros and cons, like it was listed on the website. It is not for everyone, but some people might need just that approach.
Thanks for honest feedback!