I think you may be right. The guy that's best to start the business is not necessarily the best person to run it a few years later. I'll let you know in a few years ;)
1,374 karma · joined March 13, 2009
I think you may be right. The guy that's best to start the business is not necessarily the best person to run it a few years later. I'll let you know in a few years ;)
Watching peoples' reactions doesn't really make me want to go either, but tbh, it may have made me want to see the movie if I experienced that. Not sure how many impressions that they got, but it could be significant.
Whatever their motives, angel investors want entrepreneurs to build big, meaningful companies. And the money they provide helps them to that.
I agree. We have struggled with this since the beginning.
Thanks for the feedback; we will definitely keep working on our messaging.
I ask that seriously. Obviously their goal is to build a great product, and to get people to use it.
They posted that article on the AdGrok blog because it drove a shit-ton of traffic and it received a ton of inbound links. Why wouldn't they capitalize on that?
As far as the product is concerned, it's fantastic. I've been using it in private beta for a few weeks. I would bet on these guys in a heartbeat.
Startups drive traffic and signups any way that they can, and their company name was hitting mainstream media before they even launched.
"give-everything-away-and-make-it-up-on-volume strategy stamps an expiration date on your company's ass. In other words, design something to charge for into your product and start taking money within 6 months"
Advice I hear echoed all the time, yet all the big "holy shit, what a huge valuation" consumer internet startups with experienced entrepreneurs at the helm seem to ignore it. Just a thought.
I should have said: people who have never worked for a startup that has succeeded, or for a startup that has failed, but has provided a valuable enough experience to justify working there.
Most of the people I have seen writing (and upvoting) these kinds of comments have never worked for a startup, and they are bitter (for one reason or another). Or they have worked for a startup and it's failed.
Are you really trying to look out for the best interests of all those poor, mis-guided people working for all those cruel and single-minded startups, or are you trying to convince yourself that your own life decision to work "for The Man in [your] day job in a cold corporate environment" was the right one.
I spend A LOT of time with former startup employees. They are happy with their decisions. I say former because many of them have been a part of an exit, and are now working on their own companies...with some cash in their pockets, an impressive rolodex (of investors), and a good reputation because they were part of a winning team.
Most of the employees of early stage and recently funded companies that I know are happy to be where they are. They work late because they are passionate and enthusiastic and they like to win.
Keep putting them (and the startups that employ them) down. You're cause is really noble.
Especially good for big press and turning certain ads (fb and google) on and off.
If BigCo doubles revenue this year (probably impossible if it really is a big company) how will it affect your life?
If BigCo gets acquired next year will you be popping champaign or worried about your job?
BTW - Hackers and Founders is awesome. At least one person from WePay will be at the SF meetup tomorrow.
If you have nothing, you are risking the opportunity cost of having a "real job". As long as you can find a way to support yourself (food and shelter), it's a good time to gamble.
People think that starting a business looks like this: 1. Come up with an idea 2. Build a product or service 3. Sell the product or service
When, in reality, it often looks like this: 1. See what you can sell (and sell it if you can) 2. Build it
When you say "I'll do anything", I hear: "I'll do anything that you want me to do"
That's the problem. I don't want to spend more time figuring out shit for you to do than you spend actually doing it.
I would rather hear you say: "I'd be willing to do anything, but I know that I could really help with ________"