_wegs

Are you joking? I'm legitimately asking.

Primary institute of skin cancer in Australia: https://www.cancer.org.au/cancer-information/causes-and-prev...

See number 2.

I'm hypothesising you may live in a place where skin cancer is not a big issue?

> make sure your skin gets gradually attuned

Is this a thing? Surely DNA damage from UV is dose-dependent, in which case any greater amount of UV results in a greater chance of skin cancer.

Australia is exceptionally bad for the sun. It's crazy because the incidence of skin cancer is still so high even though sun protection is drilled into us since birth. I'll rant further that Australia is not even good from a UV/temperature tradeoff because the UV is always ridiculously high. Nice warm Mediterranean summer UV level is equivalent to a freezing cold winter day in Australia.

Have you tried living in Australia? I would like SPF 100 sunscreen pronto, please and thank you

At least in Australia, removing a tick by force is not recommended. This is because it has a chance of the tick vomiting pathogens into your blood. Which is particularly bad in regions where ticks carry bad diseases (like the paralysis tick in Australia). The recommendation is instead to use a freeze spray which immediately immobilises the tick.

Pity that $100k is quickly approaching unliveable for a single young person in Australia if they want any sort of secure future.