Its not totally fair to put this all on Chinese manipulation.
Western politicians and many "tech elite" all love the concept of CCP-style 'social credit systems' being instituted.
This is ultimately what vaxpass is all about.
1,918 karma · joined September 4, 2012
Its not totally fair to put this all on Chinese manipulation.
Western politicians and many "tech elite" all love the concept of CCP-style 'social credit systems' being instituted.
This is ultimately what vaxpass is all about.
Knowing Oracle it will eventually become a nightmare anyway (whoops, we accidentally billed you $70 for the free-tier, but you need to manually call this long-distance number between the hours of 9am-4pm to reverse the charge and this also happens to be our sales dept)
Perhaps I didn't make my example clear. Imagine loop with 2 switches...one switch 1 LY away...another switch 1 meter away.
Derek flips the 1m switch and light instantly turns on: What does that tell you? Derek flips the 1m switch and light doesn't turn on: What does that tell you?
How were you able to find out that information before waiting 1 yr?
Imagine the same loop as Derek setup in the video, but where it extended into next galaxy (say 1 light year away). In next galaxy there is another switch - we don't know if the position of that switch is open or closed...
Now when Derek connects his switch and light nearly instantly turns on...this is obviously telling us information regarding the switch 1 Light Year away. How does this not violate General Relativity since seemingly that information is traveling faster than speed of light?
Thats probably true to a degree, however I think the system will breakdown this decade. Given current inflation rates, anyone with an IQ >120 will soon see that the debt/benefit ratio is becoming unworkable.
The last 2 employees my company hired actually game via github - we were using an open-source repo that someone had made and eventually reached out and asked him if he wanted to consult for us and add some features to his code...that lead to an ongoing basic permanent consulting gig.
I commented in that thread "this sub is probably not the place for these overtly political posts"...the mod responded to me by banning me for "advocating politics / agenda pushing"...its literally orwellian newspeak site.
It only makes sense that his architecture style would also favor brutalism. He probably repurposed some of the designs of the old commie-blocks from eastern europe.
Self-driving has continually been proven to be a "not-ready" piece of tech...can't imagine allowing this.
This sounds like a made-up concern.
How do you stop me from screenshotting your convo and posting on twitter, or just copying and pasting from one app to the next?
* Local RPI / Container connects to message queue in cloud * Web User inputs request to Web UI (cloud) * Local RPI / Container retrieves request via queue and access final device * Reports status back to queue which is then reported by Web UI
Basically the local device is your router using whatever message queue you want.
Our solution has been to basically mandate that the user install either a small embedded device (ie. RPI or equiv) or manually launch a container. These essentially just serve as a local websocket / api router so Chrome connects to some local "device/container" and then that connects to all the local devices.
Although this is a logistical hurdle, its actually simplified other aspects of development since now this device/container has a bit of intelligence and can act as real middleware to simplify what the UI needs to contemplate. Basically MVC-style development using hardware bits as Controller.
MacOS and Windows have figured out that showing a GUI ASAP satisfies the user. Even if in the background its still negotiating networks, initializing sub-systems, etc.
I wonder why Linux has not yet taken that approach? That is move GUI far up in the init-queue and let it initialize networks, avahi, resolved, firewalld, etc as GUI is showing login screen...
aka. Propagandist
I could:
(a) Run all as docker-compose type solution
(b) Run all as scripted Nix solution
(c) Install packages manually on general purpose OS
Lets ignore "c" for the moment as the goal is to avoid that exact scenario. Given the prevalence and widespread support for "a" why should sysadmins choose "b"?
Trying to make blanket statements leads to incorrect conclusions...there are a myriad of cases where consumers prefer classes of transactions to be digital-cash like.
Suppose you are a company, with a myriad of shareholders, do you: (a) Setup a crypto wallet and give Frank and Bill the keys, or (b) Outsource to reputable 3rd party.
I can tell you which your shareholders would prefer.
Printing money leads to greater inequality. Expect more of it.
Here is the point: Sometimes I will record 14 different versions of a lick, chord progression, etc for a song idea. Typically its over the course of several days.
It does me no good to have 14 different files date named XX-YY-ZZZZ, etc. What I want is to group those into "Ideas / Songs / Projects"
So should have
"Song Idea 1"
- 09-27-21 14:24
- 09-25-21 11:24
- 09-23-21 10:42
- 09-23-21 09:17
etcIts being hyped as "new" but its not.
However, the issue is, any moderately complex application will soon develop its own in-house Framework. Its the natural progression, very soon the head Dev will say "lets create a library to handle all our form validation requirements....lets create library separate UI from business logic...etc"
That's the real "slippery slope" from a management perspective.
Do we wind up developing our own in-house Framework which our current developers are very productive in (but new hires don't understand)? Or do we bite the bullet and opt for an already existing Framework that already has a dev community? I'm not suggesting its an easy answer as there are pros/cons to each. In the end for 90% of cases I think starting with an existing Framework (or at least "Framework-lite") is best approach.
works about as well as their 'self-driving' shtick
In recent years lots of his comedy centered on his fears of death and related religious musings...
The fact that he had been struggling with cancer really puts this in a different perspective.
RIP Norm. You were funny!
How does he know he was infected twice?
Saying that a PCR test returned positive values two times isn't a great answer - since by its nature PCR is only counting the existence (above the programmed threshold post amplification).
Serology is the only way to know for certain you were/are infected.
This highlights one of the bigger issues we have: PCR test are a very cheap and a useful way for getting estimates but their failure rate is high enough to make it pretty poor basis for doing large scale data analysis.
Sloppy job.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/06/israel-detects-link-...