Zsfe510asG

It is striking that every AI corporation has a press arm. nebius.science is from Nebius Group, which is the non-Russian rebranded Yandex and sells data centers.

Looms at least produced something useful as opposed to hot air and SEO slop.

Many of the mentally ill AI people on X supported the ICE executions in Minneapolis.

That is a good excuse for Microslop to address the overcapacity and stop building more data centers. KOSPI is down again.

Search for Anduril drone failures in Ukraine and several Lattice software failures. And perhaps capitalize "I".

How is Maven working in Iran?

We know now that Google is a sycophantic company whose DEI initiatives were all fake and dropped once Trump got elected.

This somewhat naive initiative was bound to fail. The good news is that the AI military products won't work, except perhaps for blowing up a girls' school.

Here are CEOs falling over themselves to support Hassabis' regulatory capture proposal:

https://xcancel.com/sundarpichai/status/2077086951833063580#...

https://xcancel.com/satyanadella/status/2077063479232795024#...

https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/2077415601610297535#m

It is an exclusive club and we are not part of it.

There is AI data center overcapacity already. The KOSPI crashed last week, and it's a leading indicator for the cyclical hardware industry. It already had been that indicator in the 2000 bubble.

I don't know what possessed Ellison to ruin a functioning company, but it will be interesting if he gets a margin call for ORCL's other debt exposures, which are Ellison's massive loans against his ORCL stock.

Why does he scrape other people's works then and turn them into a sausage algorithmically?

Would he not create something directly instead?

Make it an IETF mailing list and invite DJB, so we have some fun at least.

The self importance of these AGI prophets turned bureaucrats is funny.

All AI stocks are plummeting right now. Go your own way and don't listen to tech predictions, no matter how much you revere a person. Often they are all wrong.

I think this blog post could use a disclaimer that Redis has AI offerings and would like to expand in the vector database market.

The fact that the author addresses the young makes me feel uncomfortable. Gen-Z knows that currently almost all blog posts have an ulterior motive and are worded in a way that claims to be in their best interests.

Do not listen to well-known programmers who use their non-AI earned fame to steer you into the unknown future.

The AI stock market is already collapsing as we speak and these recommendations aren't worth much.

Accessing a global object as the most simple benchmark that in fact exercises the locks still shows a massive slowdown that is not offset by the moderate general speedups since 3.9:

  x = 0

  def f():
      global x
      for i in range(100000000):
          x += i

  f()
  print(x)

Results:

  3.9:        7.1s

  3.11:       5.9s

  3.14:       6.5s

  3.14-nogil: 8.4s

That is a NOGIL slowdown of 18% compared to 3.9, 44% compared to 3.11 and 30% compared to 3.14. These numbers are in line with previous attempts at GIL removal that were rejected because they didn't come from Facebook.

Please do not complain about the global object. Using a pure function would obviously be a useless benchmark for locking and real world Python code bases have far more intricate access patterns.