I don't see the causality explained. I would replace "contribution", with "correlation".
61 karma · joined December 11, 2018
I don't see the causality explained. I would replace "contribution", with "correlation".
I think you should explain and defend the policy you wish, instead of critizing an imaginary adversary by putting words in their mouth.
If you want more housing, hoping that prices will go down, say so. If you favor a SF Bay area looking progressively more like NY City, say so. Many people are very happy in NYC. And prices are also very high there.
Just expect some people to frankly disagree with that proposed evolution, and don't attack them by being non inclusive: this is not the question. Misrepresenting their arguments is not helping further your point of view.
(whose incumbent said "we will do anything to solve the housing crisis?" in your original point?)
Again you can disagree with them, it is fair, but I think their approach is perfectly understandable, and if you want to argue and debate, no one should assume they are hypocritical or morally inferior. I read thosr comments all the time on HN.
The minute you say "housing crisis", you show which situation/point of view you're coming from. It's not a crisis that "needs" to be solved with more housing, it is just your viewpoint.
So "how about limiting influx of new people / new development?"
"Sure, let's do that"
I understand newcomers may disagree with that approach, out of understandable self interest.
But implying people currently living there are clueless or more selfish by defending their interests?? Trying to make newcomers sound morally superior? Come on.... You can do better that than that.
2- you probably read in the article like all of us that chicken in Europe are vaccinated against salmonella, while this is not mandatory in the US
Therefore I am not sure how you reach this conclusion.
If someone tells me I am a ghost online, I'll smile and says "correct!!". And if the person is interested, I can explain why.
Questions are opportunities for meaningful conversation.
Boot time was OK. I would log in on the machine with RDP, because sometimes my processes were almost frozen for a while. It felt like my neighbours were stealing my CPU, but I did not know how to prove it.
Once I moved to Ubuntu, same instance type, I never experienced this.
Eventually I would get to 100%, but it could often take 10 minutes.
What I learned from those pains is how to use Linux in the Cloud.
From a personal standpoint, did it help/enrich him?
That's a very important decision, very early. And once you make it, you can't change it.
The decision to agree to sell to FB was made when they took their first seed money.
So I don't think this is fair or accurate: "rather than addressing the fundamental issues (inability to fire people, change cost structure"
- the XIII comic series, very popular in Francophone countries but not much beyond
- The Bourne Supremacy, directly inspired by the series, a massive movie success worldwide.
This puts at a competitive disadvantage international universities over US ones, regardless of education performance.
It sounds like protectionism, which will translate into more foreign students applying for US universities, driving education costs even higher.
You will now definitely buy a degree/name, not so much an education.
Sad.
Or only every time you hear about it?
Yes, employees are fighting for their wills. What's wrong with that? If you don't fight you don't get anything
If you want to start a business and make money, do not rule out old economy, and bootstrapping. Whatever VCs say.