Should be able to achieve this without selectors with HTML to Markdownish (something like Firefox's Reader mode).
596 karma · joined October 19, 2024
The intent is obvious, but the foresight into potential outcomes is shortsighted.
Labor is expensive, more competition will rise overseas, as it will become more expensive to operate.
It also crushes the opportunities of a gigantic number of individuals who are here today who had a plan in place to exist in this ecosystem. Additionally the institutions that supported them will also be hurt. Although, they might have been aware of the writing on the wall over the past year.
Really? 100k on top of a salary per year? Why would anyone do that?
Have fun, seems like a misguided reason to do that though.
A. A package hosted somewhere using a language was compromised!
B. I am not going to program in the language anymore!
I don't see how B follows A.
Seems like a stretch, no? How are streaming music companies abusing users?
There are? For example, rails has had boilerplate generation commands for a couple of decades.
It seems to me that if you have been pattern matching the majority of your coding career, then you have a LLM agent pattern match on top of that, it results in a lot of headaches for people who haven't been doing that on a team.
I think LLM agents are supremely faster at pattern matching than humans, but are not as good at it in general.
They certainly do, and I can't really follow the analogy you are building.
> We're at a higher level of abstraction now.
To me, an abstraction higher than a programming language would be natural language or some DSL that approximates it.
At the moment, I don't think most people using LLMs are reading paragraphs to maintain code. And LLMs aren't producing code in natural language.
That isn't abstraction over language, it is an abstraction over your computer use to make the code in language. If anything, you are abstracting yourself away.
Furthermore, if I am following you, you are basically saying, you have to make a call to a (free or paid) model to explain your code every time you want to alter it.
I don't know how insane that sounds to most people, but to me, it sounds bat-shit.
NYT wanted to report on who he was. He doxxed himself years before that (as mentioned in that article). They eventually also reported on that (after Alexander revealed his name, seeing that it was going to come out anyway, I guess), which is an asshole thing to do, but not doxxing, IMO.
Not really, as described in the quote you shared, it is common to refer to "recommendation systems" as "algorithms", even if its not actually such a thing.
There are plenty of examples of well-known aliases to concepts that obfuscate actual meaning in the English language, but they aren't wrong, as language is usage.
Wouldn't that be a design or HCI issue, not something innate to a language? What is a behavioral standard?
CSS is hard to know, even if you know 15 languages.
I can understand many programming languages and write in a subset of many of their features, but I wouldn't claim to know them. That would require a monumental amount of day to day effort, in my opinion (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_explanatory_depth).
To me, the best way to understand CSS is to evaluate it after rendering, and I have been writing it for decades.
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_nesting...
- https://caniuse.com/css-media-range-syntax
Recent survey of what people use to learn CSS:
https://2025.stateofcss.com/en-US/resources/
CSS Tricks article on this:
https://css-tricks.com/how-to-keep-up-with-new-css-features/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11109739/
It highlights https://www.scratchjr.org/
Well, maybe if there was more equal income distribution, less overall penalization to those who do not have as many assets, and so on, then it would be more distributed?
I mean, that is basically what is happening anyway, but you have a nation distributing that wealth through social programs, instead of capitalists sharing their take willingly with those who helped them earn it.
It is relative, no? If a nation's population decline isn't as high as another, maybe because of immigration, then they have more human resources? Also, humans tend to migrate?
Such as?
IMO, the more you allude to spooky things without adding substantive information, the more you sound like a loon.