YATA2

>that's the same meaning

No it's not. Blocked processes and blacklisted processes are two very different things.

>that's not what glean means

No one said that's what glean means.

Thank God it wasn't a joke (it was a pun)! Glad you agree puns are fine and infantalizing minorities is dehumanizing them.

>block has 1 other meaning

Wrong. A list of blocked processes?

>the word blocklist is significantly easier to glean

No it's not. If you don't know what "blacklist" means, you can pick up any dictionary from the 1700s and later and get a definition.

>but a world where white and black make many people think of skin color, I feel like it's hard to deny that at least in NA.

Don't project your neurotic racist thoughts onto others. Not everyone is as racist and neurotic as this. You're poorly attempting to gas light everyone into thinking this neurotically. Stop it.

No it's not. List of filesystem blocks? List of block devices?

Or use blacklist, a word that has a definition that predates modern computing and non-English speakers can quickly translate using any old translator, dictionary, etc.

Those are considered destructive devices, not arms, and are regulated totally differently. They are by definition not considered "arms".

>Bearing arms and being part of a well-regulated militia are American civil rights granted by the Bill of Rights. Purchasing those arms isn't a civil right.

"Voting in elections is a civil right granted by the Bill of Rights. Access to a polling station isn't a civil right."

That's effectively what you're saying. Rights enshrine access. Things like poll taxes, voter ID, etc. have all been declared unconstitutional because they infringe upon your right. Banning purchasing arms falls in the exact same category.

This is hilariously perfect. This should be posted everywhere.

One often overlooked fact is Haiti committed a real genocide against whites, almost entirely wiping them off the island (thousands were murdered).

Whites in the Americas and elsewhere were shocked and scared by the news. Many US and European sailors refused to port in Haiti due to this, which only hampered Haiti's economic growth.

When white people do it, it's a negative. Keep up. Stop being Europhobic/Anglophobic.

>You seem to have got it backwards

Not at all.

>When it's done by whites – or actually, anglophone whites – it's not even called immigration

It's called "gentrification", and it's bad according to the left.

>When others, i.e. non-anglophone non-whites, do it, that is.

When non-Whites do it it's openly celebrated, and more is called for.

You seem to have got it backwards.

>Is there evidence that the DNC specifically targeted certain demographics and actively used misinformation in order to lessen their participation in democracy?

Is there evidence that the RNC specifically targeted certain demographics and actively used misinformation in order to lessen their participation in democracy?

This is the exact way one should deal with performative social justice leftists at work.

Seriously this. A run if the mill big mac is better than most Portuguese food.

I've always loved how immigration becomes something that is bad and should be stopped when it's done by whites.

That name is problematic as it's too close to an abelist slur. You should change it to something like Bashfig, Bashful, etc. to be more inclusive.