WinterMount223

Could you be more specific?

It’s not a lie. It’s that it’s more complex than can be expressed in simple terms. Getting overly technical can be counterproductive.

Are you okay with getting individuals possibly arrested in the name of a purported common good? You are no better than the FSB itself then.

Exposure to marijuana and marijuana derivatives is optional. Exposure to lead is almost never optional.

Ok I see. I’m from Italy and I know what medications my grandfather takes, that my grandma had cryosurgery for a malignant mole, and when my father goes to the proctologist.

Also: families usually go to the same doctor so even if you don’t personally know something, your doctor probably will.

That’s always shared among the family. Don’t know where you are from.

The article has a population point of view and risk means the ensemble probability of a given sample of people having said disease. It’s correct that risk is confusing from a single person point of view where probabilities do not make sense.

Not as reliable as physical buttons and you lose some tactile feedback.