137 karma · joined September 19, 2014
I don't think I raised choosing who gets to stay and who gets deported. My big objection to the current sweeps is that they function as a dragnet where they are detaining and questioning anyone who appears Mexican/Venezuelan/etc. Generally American citizens and permanent residents get released within an hour or so, but I still think that is intolerable. For example, there was a young woman who was ethnically Latina, but was adopted by a white family so she had an anglo-sounding last name like Smith. She was keeping papers on her, knowing the sweeps were happening. She was detained and when she presented her papers the agents didn't believe that someone who looked like her could have that last name so they kept her detained for an hour or so. I think that is an erosion of my constitutional liberties and yours.
But to try and get at your question, there are lots of legislative changes I would like to see (like this: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/497...). You may not support pathways to citizenship for long-time peaceful and productive residents. I think it's orthogonal to the current cruel and unconstitutional deportation tactics.
Do you think clergy should be allowed to administer the Eucharist to detainees at Broadview? To me their refusal to allow that is emblematic of how they are deliberately being cruel. (I am trying to answer your questions directly, if you would humor me and answer one of mine.)
First, I did not support the very loose amnesty policy, but I also don't support ICE teargassing the grocery store parking lot outside of my old apartment in Logan Square. In any case I don't think one's opinion on the first thing should disqualify them from having a take on deportation tactics.
Second, I think there is substantial ambiguity in what people voted for on deportation. There were lots of promises of deporting dangerous criminals (something that I agree would be a good idea). A subset of Trump voters in 2024 did want to round up migrant day laborers standing outside of Home Depots, and they are getting what they voted for. But I think another large subset believed that there was going to be a targeted deportation of "the worst of the worst". The administration claims to be doing this, but the worst of the worst are very unlikely to be looking for work outside of Home Depot.
Lastly, to your question, I think there are many many ways for the tactics to be more humane (and constitutional). To take just one example, I think the feds should resume allowing Catholic clergy into the Chicago-area processing facility at Broadview to administer the sacrament of the Eucharist.
Insofar as brutalism is about showcasing the raw building materials, yes, I think this is precisely what brutalism is about. Brutalism often uses concrete, but the big idea is to showcase the underlying material. (And if wood is more beautiful than concrete, great!)
A way that I look at Newport's writing is, he's making claims that most organizations are leaving money on the table by not adopting better work methods. I can't unilaterally go Newport-style at my current job. But this is a forum with lots of entrepreneurial people on it, and maybe someone would like to test his theory and smoke the competition by starting a company that values Deep Work/Slow Work/etc.
I've gotten really into Ableton this past year and I've been curious whether I should get into Max for Live. Being a programmer and looking at their marketing materials, it seemed like it should tap into the right parts of my brain. But seeing your comment now ... maybe not the right move. Especially because I'm not looking to accomplish anything special, I just want a sandbox to play with digital audio concepts.
(fwiw, you have to pay for the $1k suite version of Ableton to get Max, so Bespoke could still be a great alternative even if they do a lot of the same things)
It's useful for city planners and the like because "neighborhoods" have fuzzy boundaries that people disagree on, but Chicago's community areas are well-defined.
There's also been a lot of work to nurture additive manufacturing businesses (https://ysu.edu/center-for-innovation-in-additive-manufactur...). A mixture of federal grants (partly from the Appalachian Regional Commission IIRC) and support from the university going into that.
But to your point of embracing white collar workers ... does that solve the problem economic development agencies are actually trying to solve? An interesting case study a few miles down the highway is Pittsburgh. There's been a much-hyped boom in high skilled tech jobs seeded by CMU (robotics, software startups) plus a relatively strong healthcare/biotech sector there. But that doesn't do much to replace the big swath of steel and manufacturing jobs that were around a generation ago. So average wages go up and there's probably _some_ trickle down benefits, but the new tech jobs don't do much for the median Pittsburgher whose parents/grandparents would have worked in the mills.
> For me, a house isn't an investment but it's a place where I house my family.
I really want to view the world this way :) I wish housing were a boring commodity that depreciates in value over time like a car. With prices being what they are, I am _forced_ to think of housing as an investment because of how much of my net worth will be tied up in it.
First, I submit that $430,000 is still expensive. Instead of buying the median home in Pittsburg and commuting 60+ minutes on BART to downtown SF, I could add an h and buy a huge home in my favorite neighborhood in Pittsburgh PA for about the same price and have a chill bicycle commute: https://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Pittsburgh-PA/pmf,pf_p... (Obvious and legitimate objections: fewer job options, snow.) This is just me trying to say, $430k for that arrangement does not strike me as "cheap" given alternatives in other metros.
I agree that with a tech salary it's possible to save up for a down payment and buy in the Bay Area. But the risk seems unacceptable to me. Paying ~$1M for a house is a big bet that the Bay Area housing market stays hot. I don't want my wealth to be so tied up in a hyperlocal bet like that. I see things going one of two ways (and this is probably over-simplistic).
Option 1: A $1M starter home is the new normal. Prices stay flat or keep rising over the long haul. In that case my investment is sound. But I don't want to live in that kind of place. Where will my kids' teachers live? How will I cope with the moral ickiness of living in a place where housing costs create extreme spatial segregation of the professional class from the service class?
Option 2: The vision painted above is unsustainable. Something has to give (maybe a big financial crash; maybe just state-mandated upzoning that quickly increases housing supply) and the value of my investment drops by a lot.
Either way, I'm planning to save up on the West Coast and use my nest egg back in the Rust Belt.
Help us build out Plenario (plenar.io), our open access hub for data about cities. Plenario aggregates open data about cities into a common spatial and temporal index to make data preparation easier for researchers and civic hackers. You will help us grow Plenario into the go-to platform for streaming real time data about cities, like sensor data from our lab's Array of Things network (http://arrayofthings.github.io/).
The Urban Center for Computation and Data (urbanccd.org) is a lab within the University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory working to leverage the increasing complexity, diversity, and volume of urban data sources. UrbanCCD enables practical research into understanding cities and the impact of rapid urban growth and change on the natural environment, the built infrastructure, and the social and economic health of neighborhoods.
Our Stack:
- Backend: Python 3 (Flask, SQLAlchemy) and PostgreSQL (PostGIS) - Frontend: JavaScript (ES6, Ember.js) - Hosting: AWS (Elastic Beanstalk, RDS, Redshift, Kinesis, Lambda)
Perks: - All our code is open source (github.com/urbanccd-uchicago) - Great university benefits (8% 401(k) match, 20 days paid vacation) - Office on the Magnificent Mile overlooking the Chicago River
About You: - Experience developing and maintaining a production web application required - Experience in our stack preferred
Please email willengler@uchicago.edu or apply here: jobopportunities.uchicago.edu/applicants/Central?quickFind=234864
"Avoiders" who push themselves into social situations and work they care about will fare better than ruminators.
(Although housing in the epicenter of these cities' tech boomlets can be absurd compared to the rest of the city. This new construction in Pittsburgh's East End - http://www.zillow.com/b/bakery-living-pittsburgh-pa-63CwP3/ - charges the same for 1 bed that I paid for a 3-bedroom townhouse in a solid neighborhood ~1 mile away 2 years ago.)