"we are less concerned with bitcoin as a financial instrument and more interested in bitcoin as a protocol"
64 karma · joined March 4, 2010
"we are less concerned with bitcoin as a financial instrument and more interested in bitcoin as a protocol"
Instead of using chemical rockets for the entire dV how about using a rocket to get into orbit and then using an ion engine driven by solar energy to lose the additional 20km/s? It seems the "fuel" weight required would be significantly less.
This graph show the memory latency for a linked list walk that strides across a certain size buffer in memory. I used to use this picture for interviews and ask people to explain as much as they can about the processor from the picture. It end works for people who know nothing about processor architecture as I can walk them over what it says and see how they think and react to new information.
That is the rub right there. Think about what this means. Every ALU operation needs to read whatever register contains this state and write a new value. So every ALU operation becomes serially dependent all all previous operations. You have just totally killed performance on out-of-order processors.
Processor designers work really hard to avoid these kinds of operations. In fact between the Pentium and the Pentium Pro (aka p6) the behavior of condition codes on several x86 instructions were changed from "keep old value" to "always cleared". We couldn't find any code that cared and it was never previously documented.
This code doesn't have to use branches, it could also OR the condition codes to some register after every operation. This would also hurt performance, but only for code that cares instead of all code.
This is answered by the mentions relative to TIOBE graph. They use VB, but they are careful not to talk about it.
OK, but didn't we just have a discussion on hacker news showing that helicopters with one large blade are more efficient than ones with many smaller blades?
That would mean the company gets a log of all transactions.
But look at the chart you posted. I see a sharp uptick on a nice linear trend since July. Now go look at the rest of the chart and ask yourself what happened every time there was a sharp uptick? Hmmm
I believe bitcoin will continue to grow, but I wouldn't tell people this is a good time to buy. Wait for the "correction" then buy.
(And I imagine money can be used to "open" a spot, but that won't appear in tuition summaries.)
BTW it is probably possible to verify that the money donated was REALLY send to the bitcoin faucet.
Oh and yeah I got my first bitcoins from the faucet like many of these other people. It was an important service, however given how bitcoins can be split up it didn't need to be giving out large amounts at all.
Here is the original EFF donation page: http://web.archive.org/web/20110514012705/https://www.eff.or...
It contains the bitcoin address.
Here is the history for that address: https://blockchain.info/address/1MCwBbhNGp5hRm5rC1Aims2YFRe2...
Which as you can see received a total of 3,515.077 BTC. This is still a lot and is worth over $400k today, but way short of your 20,000.
FYI, here is the original discussion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20185.0
edit: That discussion was right after the first bitcoin bubble and at the time it was trading for around $17 so the total donations that they were talking about was about $60k. Still a lot of money to be going to the faucet (and down the drain?).
The miners are not really filtering satoshidice, they are filtering all transactions that start with '1dice' this includes them and a tiny number of false positive matches.