Volt

Is your point that they'll fall for it again?

> MacOS X is so unstable that even go developers had to go through libSystem

Just to be clear to anyone else, the Mac OS X syscall interface is guaranteed to be unstable by Apple. Going through libSystem is the only way.

That's the point

It still sucks. I have a few Haskell projects from a few years ago that I wanted to compile on another system. So I froze the dependencies, moved the project, and tried to build. Solver failed. I gave up.

Two things:

1. Why does the article in particular upset you? You talk about how J looks like ASCII vomit, and the article is trying to mitigate that. Perhaps it doesn't go far enough, which I would agree with.

2. What does an APL successor look like? Beyond object-orientation (which I don't see as contributing much).

>The same could have been said of Gopher.

I don't think Chrome ever supported Gopher, but if some other browser removed something that worked fine before I wouldn't like it either.

Code is code and code is good.

Does it have a garbage collector yet?

Like which ones?

The implementation needs to be maintained.

To be honest, if they're going to do stuff like that they shouldn't be offering those features at all.

Developers should stick to implementing features they're likely to maintain.

Should have applied item 4 to item 3. I don't really know what's going on there.

It's a comparison to Lisp.

There's no open source version of kdb+.

They were only marked as WIP when people noticed they were missing.

Not the parent, but I think dynamic linking with system libraries is the only time it makes good sense. Otherwise you're just asking for trouble.

But this is about Linux.

I hope you're a scientist.

What are they moving to?

What makes it obvious?

I'm trying this with Dyalog 16 (Mac OS X) and I'm getting WS FULL. Do you know why that might be?

BTW, what kind of machine are you testing on?

That China needs to put in that much effort to be competitive with the US isn't a particularly good sign.

Work smarter, not harder.

Precisely what are you looking for? Projects that were negatively received, or projects that nobody cared about?

>and if it’s a toss up between the JS powered 3MB+ websites and endless shitty electron apps or WASM, I’m going to elect for WASM.

I don't know why you think the situation would improve with WASM.

Taking this further, wouldn't this imply that WebAssembly is only for the Web?

Really? He single-handedly killed Flash? What a powerful man.

Same thing could have been said for Java apps 15 years ago.

Medium does have RSS feeds: https://medium.com/feed/<username>

Yes, there are degrees. But everybody wants their language to be a winner, I guess.

If by Python you mean numpy, then yes.