Ulti

I love the bug too really :'( I have a Moomin on my desk, I have the aesthetic sensibility of a two year old. The problem is no one else I work with does. That is a problem, at least for me.

Well it can by context, but yeah sniggering does abound. At least she doesn't also have a "fanny pack" in the logo too.

OOC how many people would be interested in a Perl 6 Corporate Look n' Feel type site? Where everything is just designed to be boring and on message for production use in a business setting. Front page has Docker deployment and continuous integration setup steps etc. (that all exists and works FYI) Everything would be muted colours and mostly cloning the style of https://www.haskell.org/ or https://nodejs.org/en/ or even as spartan as https://www.rust-lang.org/

I love Perl 6 but I utterly reject and hate the Fisher Price look and feel. It makes it impossible to have a serious conversation at work about Perl 6 or get anyone less than light hearted to care about taking a look at the language. There is so much great stuff there, and basically none of it is for children. I'd go as far to say as Perl 6 would be an awful language for very young children. Something like Scratch has put the effort in there. The idea of Camelia being friendly to kids is a great sentiment... but thats as deep as anyone's effort or considerations have gone for children learning to program in the Perl 6 community. IMHO anyone who feels that's a harsh assessment has probably never attempted to teach programming to young children, I have! It's a near impossible task, and the last thing you touch is syntax or documentation websites. I cant help but feel Camelia and her scheming colours are ham stringing adoption by anyone else looking in from their cubicle or startup loft. Maybe I'm very wrong and everyone loves the bug?

Yeah because we can't possibly have languages which diverge in syntax... I mean I don't use any languages every day where the concat operator is || for example which is short circuit OR for most people. cough PgSQL cough

JavaScript overloading + to mean addition and string concatenation was the worst decision ever given the use case of JS. 1 + '1' * 1 is not the same as '1' + 1 * 1 good job. That definitely wont be evil once the values are in a more complex equation with variables coming from some server side JSON string... at all. Definitely wont lead to any unusual bugs when something like the following happens 1 + '000001'. You might not notice 2 being 12 for a while but your customer will likely notice 2 suddenly becoming 1000001.

At least '~' joins two different string together when writing. Makes a lot more sense than '+' to me ~ Ulti 2015