(writing this from a MacBook with an encrypted SSD)
2,271 karma · joined July 29, 2009
(writing this from a MacBook with an encrypted SSD)
But the nagging feeling is what this Valve employee (who was fired) described: The company is led by the bullies just like in highschool.
I would be interested in the statistics you base this on. How many strikes are fire support strikes vs. "lone" drone strikes? My impression up to your comment was that most drone strikes are not fire support strikes.
From looking at it, PG describes how things are (YC applications, startup CEOs) and Catherine describes how things should be.
I myself get often argued with because people confuse when I describe things a I see them with I tell people how they should be.
"“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. [...] One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
The only downside I see is that some people will be disappointed because the salary reflects their skills and the value the company puts in them. For some this is hard to take if they are in the bottom 20% of people in their peer group.
Said that, it's probably a good idea to start with this compared to introducing this later.
The current government promised a 8,50EUR minumum wage.
Fun fact: The leftist German news paper TAZ who was fighting for minumum wage for quite some time, argued against the minumum wage for it's intern as "not possible".
[1] e.g. when you are below some wage, the government pays you some money for the "gap"
This might change with the current government.
[1] There are quite some people living on the street though - especially in larger cities - who for various reasons can't or won't claim their social welfare money.
So what's next?
[1] That said the common idea is in school and on television since around the 70s: The coolest guy is the one with the worst grades - every celebrity boosts how bad they were at school. And living on welfare has become a verb ("harzen") and is the live goal (perspective?) of many young people.
Understanding the breaking down of problems into commands, loops, conditionals using variables, data structures, functions, about abstracting solutions into more general solutions, about refactoring, legacy code etc. helps a lot, even if one is not "a programmer" afterwards.
I can only recommend to everyone doing this at your company.
Indeed! I would from my experience not use Z80 assembler - though I like it much more than 6502 - and CP/M as an OS for a social media website.
I have the gut feeling though that your comment might be about Java, which might not be warranted. The last company I've worked for makes >$200M in profit a year and will be sold soon for >$1b - based on a Java platform. The next company I worked for was skyrocketing and sold for $200M - based on a Java platform. Both profited from good performance, stability and GC maturity during high periods of growth and load and a good pool of developers during peak hiring times.
But then we might differ in our goals and evaluation criteria, mine is about getting things done to support a business in a sustainable way.
Criticism in this way is rare though. Bashing a language to be cool, be part of the hip crowd, make you feel better about your own choices, bashing languages for karma or laughs, bashing languages you have no experience in comparing it with a language you've used for some weeks is not criticism.
Does it help others? If it does, it is criticism. If it doesn't and only makes you feel good after posting, it's not.
[Edit] And the really sad part is that people make language arguments into people arguments, stereotyping people to make themselves feel better.