The answer was - 21... "You know, first we multiply by 2 and then we start to add 3" :) . Perfect "creative thinking" test.
The IQ tests, even if they are valid are still inherently broken, just forget about them and carry on.
124 karma · joined January 4, 2012
The answer was - 21... "You know, first we multiply by 2 and then we start to add 3" :) . Perfect "creative thinking" test.
The IQ tests, even if they are valid are still inherently broken, just forget about them and carry on.
Also if we imagine some person starting bookmark list from scratch, with tags - he has to A) make complete tag system from the beginning (I've tried, it's not easy) or he'll be forced to re-tag old ones later; B) type in tags (or select) every time he bookmarks site.With folder trees I use one click to drag&drop bookmark to the intended place.
Tags are the future but only if someone would be able to automate them completely.
On sets with 10-100 bookmarks type of index system is completely irrelevant - you can even keep them in a plain list and still don't waste time.
This method won't help of course so in the future you'll need to distinguish so people as "experts" (this is a human task, it can't be awarded statistically - by a number of reviews or anything similar). After that implement separate rating for them.
Even that won't fix biased reviews but will mitigate them considerably. The task of implementing good rankings is a very hard one.
This won't be end of the world or the internet. Not even close to it. Things just will be different in the future and people would accept them.
PS: and as for iPad 2 I'm not sure about battery life, I rarely discharge it from 100 to 0 in one session.
Yeah, right. Probably in some other internet. You can't find a site today where there they weren't discussed at least once.
Personally I won't take them without prescription from a doctor. Yes, downsides are pretty obscure and rare but the same are benefits. Based on reviews they are not some magic pills like in Limitless. Closer to placebo actually.
... and click "Save" :)
It's unbelievable how many "facts" nowadays lead to some lone blog or wiki article with no references.
Wrong. Instead user karma system should be deleted completely. (Yes, I know that I am a "newbie" here. Think what you want.). I have seen too many portals died or degraded by the weight of "karma". The only working example is probably Stack Overflow and I think they won't last long because of it.
Only reason why SO can survive is continuous strict moderation. I like "C++ vs Java", "Most influential book" and similar topics very much but they really don't belong to SO by their rules.
The same should be applied to HN - ban those millions Twitter and FB topics. Ban topics with complaints (however reasonable). Ban SOPA/ACTA etc. topics.
In short - filter everything that is not educational for IT specialists. Yes, it would be more boring that way (or not) but it would ensure HN quality and survival.
And this - "Facebook’s mission – to make the world more open and connected" is just hilarious (forgive me Louis :) ).
One individual has at most 16 hours a day for internet and if someone would estimate average times that the discrete number of sites to visit would be rather low. It is entirely possible (not 100% sure) that after initial shock communities will restructure a little, some really obscure sites with little unique content or services will die, but users won't leave. they'll just shift to occupy all the sites they really want to visit.
And right now I see that small and obscure websites are NOT findable in search engines. They don't do SEO and SMO, they are totally dominated by ad driven monsters they produce and produce and produce... well something. Sometimes good content sometimes not. Mostly not actually. I almost never find really good unknown stuff in Google&Co, only by direct links from friends and random people. Such sites are like dark matter of the internet, real but invisible knowledge. Invisible behind the noise from ad giants.
And by the way, please define "rich" and "rich enough".
inb4: "but ads fund free open web" - I can live with paying subscription for every single site I really want to visit (even huge subscriptions if the site is that good). There are very few of those. AND many "free open" sites do not have ads even now.
1. Corporate abuse (just like Valve did recently and thousands others do every day) - you can't do anything about that. No really anything. The most individual can do is strike corporation where they don't expect, that only work once and for one individual. In all other cases it is pointless - there is just way too big weight difference. And no, the class action suite would only make big corp smile. Valve done this and nothing can be done about that.
2. Individual abuse (download hash table, find passwords, do whatever) - you can confront that, but only in equal conditions. Hacker uses his tools, knowledge etc and user uses tools provided by cloud (in man vs. man case clouds tend to try being all good and protect user). So when Amazon made this security hole they took some of user tools, namely account-content link. This was done not by some evil plan to force users to buy second copies, that would be absurd, but because Amazone didn't care enough - "they want delete feature? fine, enable it for everything and everyone".
Jelly donuts rant was a nice touch in the end :) .
People really do that? Not search for some specialized site and ask/search there but actually click on ADs to buy useful things?
You can easily swap solving math problems for writing essays in that article and get the same conclusion. Also the whole article completely lacks any statistic basis. 42% of students didn't pass their bachelor exams and 57% students of one university (not saying which faculties were included in statistics) didn't pass algebra course (one math course only is mentioned). So what? How is that connected? What are the long term trends? What about other courses and other universities? Same applies for all the article - throw together random numbers that SEEM to be related (they may be, of course).
Very shallow and probably incorrect article.
This is why directories are getting old - they allow only one tag for a file - the folder name. New systems, like iTunes and others are introducing concept of advanced tags - you can find the same file in the Author "dir" in the Genre "dir" in the Type "dir" etc. They aren't perfect yet but they are being refined all will be dominant in the future.