You make it sound easy! How do I do that outside of not just SF, but the US?
169 karma · joined September 11, 2017
You make it sound easy! How do I do that outside of not just SF, but the US?
And while I'm at it r/IUseReddit
apt is way better than apt-get anyways.
The only reason I call it PUA is that I don't know what else to call approaching strangers I find attractive in a respectful and honest way, especially because it seems that where I live or the people I go out with never meet new people.
6cd6beb encapsulated it wonderfully, if PUA is taken as only this and not the manipulative alpha male b/s that is taught, I believe it can teach men a lot of perspective and respect towards the opposite sex:
[...] the general formula of "know your value, be confident and unapologetic about what you want, be ready to accept 'no' quickly and gracefully" is the buried gold. Maybe it's just me but grinding through failure after failure after failure taught me those things.
Maybe they're looking for tools the other groups use to establish initial beachheads and not tools that are used for exploitation, info gathering or other more involved tasks.
How did you fing these groups?
Likewise, I've made friends in the US who are of Mexican descent and look very much like it but don't speak a lick of Spanish.
This has led me to feel not at home in either my country of origin or Canada. Since I'm too white to be from here and don't know enough about Canadian lifestyle to relate to anyone there.
Sadly in my country proper form isn't all that common and I've seen so many people do squats with plates under their heels, so finding a knowledgeable expert isn't easy.
I don't think the fact that you find it hard to do so should be a reason to restrict your user-base. I see a case for single-gender outings and understand that some people would prefer such outings, but I think co-ed outings could add to the app.
EDIT: Just saw your link on why tribes are single gendered. I didn't really take the creep-factor into account. Maybe a 2 on 2 female/male ratio would help reduce it, best of luck with figuring it out, it's a tough nut to crack!
where Cb = C (2^(be) mod(n)) (mod n)
I assume we are calculating Cb by encrypting the bit-shift and then applying it to C (which is already encrypted). Why do we need that last modulus at the end?