104 karma · joined February 19, 2018
Just an aside, but that is a gigantic undersell of veterinarians. The difficulties of becoming one aside, just seeing that "humans-only" doctors only work on one kind of ape, compared to the many very different kinds of life forms a veterinarian has to deal with (of course they specialize too), I don't understand why one would think a veterinarian would deserve the word "only".
Your 1) Please read again, this does not fit to anything I wrote. Especially the main point, that inconvenient "anybody" vs. "everybody" thing that you completely ignore.
Your 2) This too has nothing at all to do with what I wrote. You respond to whatever strange visions appear in your own mind. I'm very sorry for you if you find the idea that people who are down and/or out are getting help so frightening, that non-rich people don't have to live in fear. And if you want to point to the "overachievers" - again see my main point and answer those points (first you have to actually notice and acknowledge them, of which there is no sign even though it was the main point of my post, "anybody" vs. "everybody").
Do you have proof, or do you just happen to feel this way without actually knowing any background story? If you make such an accusation you should state your reasons, preferably observable facts. Both "hacker" and "news" are generic terms after all.
In addition, even if they did mimic the name, I would not see a problem. It's very descriptive, unlike a completely made-up word that someone spent a lot of effort on to establish as a brand.
What happens if "everyone" does it and now you compete not with a few but with hundreds, thousands? Will you still do and feel so good? Does your suggestions scale if it is applied not just to a few? What makes you think you can just multiply your particular personal situation by [insert any number here] and it will still work?
I think such huge levels of new "entrepreneurs" just means you get something like "Uber jobs". All the risk of being on your own but none of the benefits of being part of a large organization. Even if every single new entrepreneur were to cure one kind of cancer - how many such people are needed before the ROI on a cure for a cancer form is down to pennies? Just to use an extreme example where every single person actually is a genius. Now imagine what happens when most people are ordinary. Not to mention that actual monetization of cures for forms of cancer can only be handled by - large companies! It seems to me to be quite clear, given the complexity of what needs to be done in today's world economy (vs. shoe makers or smiths or XYZ makers in centuries past who could happily work alone or with just family) that most people in the economy should be employed and part of large(r) organizations. If everybody is an individual (entrepreneur) this would not fit into how modern society works, solving complex tasks in a tight network of people.
To me it's like propagating a mostly bacteria world because multicellular organisms, where individuals give up most of their autonomy and prefer to be part of a big organization, are somehow "bad" (and cancer cells, breaking out of the organization to follow their own path, are somehow rebels fighting for freedom?). To me, people giving up many of their freedoms to work in a higher-level form of organization is something positive, and I think we actually need more of it. The problem is that, following the multicellular organism analogy, today's organisms (firms) are quite hostile towards their own cells (workers). Too narrow-minded. They could (allowed to) be that way - if the parent organization, the state, would jump in and provide the safety instead, on the (even) higher level. For the unbelievable wealth (in tools, knowledge, infrastructure, processes, networks) that at least part of humanity has accumulated and achieved I think we have waaayyyyy too much risk completely unnecessarily put on individuals, for no good reason. We could easily give everyone food and shelter and some basics. To me, much of that pressure on people is completely artificial. "Sure, we could feed you, but we won't because you are unworthy."
Quoting myself:
> unless you were huge enough to have your own locations
Those locations are millions, sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars investments with backup power generators large enough to provide power to a comfortably sized village. So, "large enough to a) need and b) able to afford owning such a location just for your own needs", e.g. Google, Amazon. Even companies like large banks have their servers co-hosted in a separate section but in the location owned by a 3rd party co-hosting provider. To own one you either are one of those providers or you are in the "Google tier". For the purposes of the current context, the linked article, one would even need to have multiple such locations all over the world. I think that qualifies as "huge" (the company owning such infrastructure just to run their own servers, co-hosting firms do it for others).
By the way, there are links below the text, here's the one to the HN discussion of 2016: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10885727
I learned (soprano and alto) recorder when I was young, in evening classes at a music school (East Germany), and started learning to play violin a few years ago (which turned out to be _the_ instrument for me, I can't stop and after a few years I know it's not short term). I had always practiced a bit on the recorder on and off. Fortunately nobody had forced me to continue music school. When I was young I had sooo many other interests. Being told what to do can hardly be a recipe to create a person that acts on their own? Sounds more like a recipe of trying to educate somebody who follows orders well.
So what???
> but my next-door neighbours will follow different rules.
Some rules are different, many are not.
> Alas, money is always an overriding concern.
No it isn't, see what I wrote.
Your entire comment is an amazing display of cluelessness about the forces acting on you. Cultural norms are a FAR bigger factor. Yes you don't realize it, see what I wrote.
You are also quite confused about what is being discussed. What is that about building houses and buying stuff? If the topic is too difficult for you, just don't comment, posting incoherent random thoughts is useless. Yes, we indeed use money in the economy, great insight.
The human world outside "money" is far larger and the bonds also far stronger than inside of it, I would claim. It's just that one is mostly subconscious and the other one very often requires conscious attention, so guess which one you always notice.
The whole point about the current topic as well as of my post: You missed by about a thousand miles. Please read it again. It's really pointless to argue about a strawman created by you. Your model is useless, that's the point! It makes no real(!) predictions - not usable for anything apart from blowing ever more hot air, and if it doesn't come to pass, you are never wrong because you left the door open by not actually saying anything in the first place.
Do you not understand that the guy/his company did nothing at all? And that giving some arbitrary probability was/is utterly devoid of any meaning (especially if you can't be wrong whatever the actual outcome)? They could have made any prediction at all, what difference would it have made? That is the value of that "work".
However, I realize there's people who like such meaningless drivel. It is a version of appearing to actually do something while not actually doing anything. You make it into the news but you can never be held accountable because whatever happens happens, you just helped create a few more entirely useless headlines (apart from helping with page views and ad impressions of course). It's actually quite ingenious to misuse actually useful tools like statistics.
As for the "50/50" here, I don't think this is meant as being exact numbers (after all, the whole point of the issue is that those exact numbers don't really tell you anything, if anything still is possible and any outcome can be justified later), but simply as the common usage of a phrase in the vernacular for "we don't know either way".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation#Credit_theory_o...
> The fractional reserve theory where the money supply is limited by the money multiplier has come under increased criticism since the financial crisis of 2007–2008. It has been observed that the bank reserves are not a limiting factor because the central banks supply more reserves than necessary[19] and because banks have been able to build up additional reserves when they were needed.[20] Many economists and bankers now realize that the amount of money in circulation is limited only by the demand for loans, not by reserve requirements.
> ...
> Banks first lend and then cover their reserve ratios: The decision whether or not to lend is generally independent of their reserves with the central bank or their deposits from customers; banks are not lending out deposits or reserves, anyway. Banks lend on the basis of lending criteria, such as the status of the customer's business, the loan's prospects, and/or the overall economic situation.
First, it isn't false at all, commercial banks create money, just as they say in the paper. Second, if you make the bold claim that the people of the Bank of England wrote a paper that is false you should provide more than a single sentence - especially when commenting here on HN.
"Money creation in the modern economy" (Bank of England, PDF)
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-...
Quote:
In the modern economy, most money takes the form of bank deposits. But how those bank deposits are created is often misunderstood: the principal way is through commercial banks making loans. Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money. The reality of how money is created today differs from the description found in some economics textbooks:
• Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits.
• In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money ‘multiplied up’ into more loans and deposits.
To quote from the blog post:
> I was curious to see how much of the dissertation I can still grasp, five years after the fact. I figured it couldn’t hurt my ego if I refreshed my mind with past mathematical glories.
> How wrong I was.
> This was not the casual read I had in mind. The notation was alien. I even had to scour the examiner’s report to direct me to the key results. And while I could have sworn this was a well-written thesis, I repeatedly found myself bamboozled by my own prompts. “The result now follows easily…” may have made sense back when, but now the author-turned-confused reader can profess that it most certainly does not follow easily, at least in his own mind.
https://medium.com/@fjmubeen/ai-no-longer-understand-my-phd-...
The first thing I found was, after having first dismissed it as esoterics when I found it on the net, that I had a candida problem. Proven by the significant immediate effect of taking Nystatine (anti-fungal) and a doctor confirmed it. Later I even got Fluconazole, an internal antifungal, again with huge effects. Just an aside, funnily enough, the warts on the sole of my feet that every doctor would say were caused by a virus disappeared by 95% after Fluconazole.
Anyway, I learned Candida never is a cause but itself just a symptom, and since I had none of the conditions that are listed in the text books that might cause it I had to continue looking. Heavy metal poisoning was one of the only options that would explain the Candida, but also everything else. And I had only one possible source: amalgam fillings.
When the tests confirmed high levels of mercury in my hair as well as in my urine I still was not completely sure: It was high but not high enough to explain the severity of my issues. The doctor I went to said it was high enough to justify starting chelation, but I must have something else. I had the remaining three fillings removed with special equipment and protection. I had had three or four removed decades earlier without protection, just normal drilling, at the beginning of my CS study, and now something made sense: At the time I had suddenly, out of nowhere and pretty much overnight, developed almost-asthma level pollen allergy, and for half a year I had severe problems with the right leg joint. I never went to a doctor for the joint because the symptoms clearly showed me it was not "physical", I can't explain it with a few words. I also developed severe insomnia and - as I understand now but not at the time - "dumb". I had always been good at math, for example, but suddenly it was a problem. Stuff that today, after all my chelation, again looks very easy to me. I still passed and I was still very good at everything more practical so getting through the study was no problem. At the time I completely ignored all those sudden issues and took it as "that's just live".
Everything started to improve greatly during the first year of chelation, and after the fifth or so DMPS treatment in the following weeks the tissue around my right-side thyroid became very active. That was very curious, because I had had a double-sized right thyroid with a nodule for at least two decades, re-diagnosed just a year prior. Recommendation back then was surgery to get rid of the nodule. The tissues in that area became active after two or three DMPS treatments. I went to the endocrinologist again when I felt nothing else there. He did an ultrasound, and when he was done he started casually looking through his notes and became more and more agitated. He asked me to lie down again and he repeated the ultrasound, right side only this time. At the end the result still was this: Thyroid size nearly completely normal, and the nodule had disappeared completely. That was the point when I actually believed that yes, I had found the source of the problem.
Regarding an even more clear proof for amalgam fillings as the cause:
After about a year the doctor wanted to make an injection in to my buccal mucosa. It's just mucosa, so you don't need any force, but his needle ended up deep inside jaw bone. He found several places where the needle easily penetrated into bone. All those places where where amalgam fillings had been for two or three decades. He injected DMPS and just like in the thyroid area the are began to "work". Very actively. A year later the needle could not penetrate anywhere any more. The jaw remained a very very active area though for years, and it still reacted to chelation. An aside: The are had been OPG x-rayed a few times in the years before because I had finally gotten my crooked teeth fixed and jaw extension surgery too (now I have perfect bite and teeth, wonderful!!!). No doctor ever saw anything in my jaw. One wasn't sure about seeing a tiny shadow near one root - the one where I had the most issues and that was the most active later during chelation - but didn't take it serious enough and didn't follow up (when patients don't complain why would you if it's so subtle). But bone that can be penetrated by a needle easily is very broken. This shows how much (more) broken something has to be to show up even in an OPG x-ray.
My doctor never found anything else and now he too thinks that the only problem there ever was were the amalgam fillings. A lot - a lot! - of very interesting stuff happened to me, the chelators only paved the way out and started it, 99% of the actual work was done by my body (most chelators only work in extracellular space anyway). For example, there were three months of nightly 3-4 am kidney pain, but after the nephrologist found that despite elevated protein levels in urine there was no sign of kidney disease I didn't worry about it. It fit into the pattern of stuff happening at various times all over my body and my brain, a new phase starting every few months in another area of the body. For those three kidney pain months I simply got up when it started at 3 am or so, went to bed when it stopped at 5 am and slept until 10 and still got my sleep. No problem.
Even tough I'm a CS person, I actually have a background not in medicine, but (for fun and out of interest) I've also have many courses in biology, chemistry, org.chemistry, biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, neuroscience, several courses in each. I don't care about pathologies, I only wanted to understand the basics of biology and life and of human physiology.
You could also explain this with low-level heavy metal exposure, e.g. mercury, as well as a large amount of other possibilities :-)
I thought hard if I should write this, as a joke and only the above line at first, but here it goes. Having read your second paragraph too, that is pretty much exactly what I said to myself a decade ago and before. Then some things escalated a little bit and I was forced to either accept all my increasing issues, or do some research myself.
Turned out I had chronic heavy metal poisoning from mercury. Fortunately diagnosis was made easy because I actually had high levels of it in hair and blood (and urine - same as blood since that's where that comes from). Anyway, the scale of the problem was only made clear during chelation therapy, when both I as well as my (university clinic researcher) doctor were amazed at all the things that improved, including "miracles" such as thyroid normalization (had been enlarged and with a nodule for decades, completely gone within half a year of DMPS chelation, left the endocrinologist speechless, literally, he checked me twice with ultrasound to make sure he had not make a mistake). This issue is next to impossible to diagnose with today's methods, unlike acute poisoning, because how much you see in blood, urine or even hair does not say anything about the size of the problem, it only shows up when it actually moves around the body which it only does after exposure.
I had had dry eyes too, and of course the ophthalmologist as well as I myself attributed it to too much screen work. Today, after years of chelation, I sit in front of a monitor much more than ever before - but now I have zero issues. Same with RSI. Sooo many little things are completely gone from my body, depression too.
The crazy thing is, up to that point ~10 years ago when I had to confront that something was not quite right, I called myself "healthy". And why not? I could run a half marathon just for fun and still come back feeling relaxed. All the many little issues I had, such as a few warts on the feet (more and more over the decades but I ignored the trend), winter depression (many people have that, it's normal!), eye problems (not really severe, so not worth thinking about it) and many many other, my brain refused to think about it. The reality my brain created of my world was highly distorted, but I did not know it. Only the huge and unexpected changes happening after I began chelation (DMPS, later DMSA) showed me the extend of the thus far ignored problem.
If something somebody proposes in response to a population-wide problem works for anyone it should also be tested if it works for everyone. A lot of "how to get ahead and gain wealth" suggestions come to mind too that fail the second test.
My first pilgrimage was to Lourdes in the South of France - as a member of the German army. During an introduction course in the first weeks after joining the army we were told we were entitled to certain programs, and getting time off from the army. After basic training and entering regular service I went to the base's priest, told I'm I'm an atheist and that I'm interested in going to Lourdes. No problem. Best party of my life I must say, in a landscape straight from a movie (but I think I was the only one of ~35,000 soldier pilgrims to walk into the hills, even if they started right at the edge of town).
Second pilgrimage was with a Catholic girlfriend, walking from dawn to dusk to a Catholic pilgrimage destination for several days. Very strenuous. I even "spread god's word" in a sense, when towards the end somebody thought I still looked fresh and strong so I got to carry one of the loudspeaker backpacks used to spread the prayers spoken by a priest at the end of the procession along the long line of pilgrims :)
Nobody cares what you are. Just go if you want. There even are priests that are atheists: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/lutherans-in-a-quandary-over...
> Alarm bells started ringing in earnest last June, when the priest in question, Thorkild Grosboel, pastor of Taarbaek, a town near Copenhagen, went on to elaborate his views in an interview. "There is no heavenly God, there is no eternal life, there is no resurrection," he said, with typical Scandinavian matter of factness.
> Grosboel has since refused to step aside and insists that his lack of belief in some of the theological foundations on which the Christian church is built, does not stop him fulfilling the duties for which he is paid.
https://video-frx5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t42.1790-2/12024956_6368...