74 karma · joined March 10, 2010
Verify with the charitable organization that they registered to receive funds from Amazon!
Amazon's list of charities comes from GuideStar USA which compiled the information from the IRS, and includes organizations which may not have registered with Amazon and thus may never receive the donations. See the section "Charitable Organizations that Do Not Register" here: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/chpf/pd/ref=smi_se_saas_lpd_spd
Last I checked, there is no clear indication to consumers that a listed charity has actually registered.
The best way to verify this on your own appears to be to pretend you want to register that organization on Amazon's Org Central site[0] which will show if it's already registered. (An example search for Child's Play[1].)
As a shopper Amazon does not make this abundantly clear when you're selecting an organization. One thing to look for is the amount of information shown about the organization, specifically the incorporation year, as those that register have to fill out a profile.
According to the FAQ if a shopper selects an organization that is not registered and makes an eligible purchase they will track the donation. If the organization registers they'll get the donation, but if they have not after 2 years then Amazon will contact the shopper and give them 30 days to select a new charity. (I'm not sure if this then resets the 2 year clock or not.) If the shopper does not select a new organization then Amazon reallocates the donation across the registered organizations.
In any case the only way to be 100% sure is to inquire with the organization.
[1]: https://org.amazon.com/npo/search?q=Child%27s%20Play&p=1
> While I'm obviously not a native English speaker...
This is absolutely not obvious from your posts - don't be so hard on yourself!
I've not used it and I have a feeling it doesn't really help one take full advantage of their IDE of choice but it might still beat the online editor.
The best way appears to be to pretend you want to register that organization on Amazon's Org Central site[0] which shows which already registered. (An example search for Child's Play[1].)
As a shopper I do not believe Amazon makes this abundantly clear when you're selecting an organization. One thing to look for is the amount of information shown about the organization, specifically the incorporation year, as those that register have to fill out a profile.
According to the FAQ if a shopper selects an organization that is not registered and makes an eligible purchase they will track the donation. If the organization registers they'll get the donation, but if they have not after 2 years then Amazon will contact the shopper and give them 30 days to select a new charity. (I'm not sure if this then resets the 2 year clock or not.) If the shopper does not select a new organization then Amazon reallocates the donation across the registered organizations.
In any case the only way to be 100% sure is to inquire with the organization.
[1]: https://org.amazon.com/npo/search?q=Child%27s%20Play&p=1
The list of charities that Amazon shows are from GuideStar USA which has compiled the information from the IRS, but this includes organizations which may not have registered and thus may never receive the donations.
See the section "Charitable Organizations that Do Not Register" here: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/chpf/pd/ref=smi_se_saas_lpd_spd
However, you can add your own tokens and assign different priorities to them.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/using-the-...
This then allows me to squeeze part of my hand/fingers between the cover and the Kindle and doesn't get too tiring.
It would be nice if they offered to e-mail this to you once a week/month or provided more detail. Even better would be for them to show some of that information in the place of the ads you've purchased.
1. It works anywhere I can log into Google, which means I see less ads on my mobile device or in browsers where I might not have been able to install an ad blocking extension.
2. You can configure what you see in place of most ads. Thus my browsing now has more cats: http://imgur.com/fqF0YJb
The only reason I'm thinking about ditching Contributor at this point is because I'm more of a dog lover.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/onecode/p/devassistant.aspx
Sadly they also appear to be keeping it closed source.
For instance on one address book app the website currently shows them asking for: Contacts/Calendar -read your contacts -modify your contacts
While the app on my phone says: Contacts -read your contacts -modify your contacts
According to Android Police an update earlier this month to the Play Store app appears to have separated them again: http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/12/06/apk-teardown-play-st...
Also, while Google's specs don't list wireless charging Motorola does: https://www.motorola.com/us/Nexus-6/nexus-6-motorola-us.html...
Haven't been able to find info on whether the Nexus 9 supports Qi as well - but again I'm disappointed with the increased size over the Nexus 7 there.
They're using 80+ signals to steer recommendations including the user's install history, location, and G+ network/reviews. I'd bet Apple is doing much of the same - they may even have had similar sessions at WWDC.
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Od2SuL2igA
Certainly worth a watch before agreeing with Marco that no one in the world cares about a user's experience on Android devices after they're sold.
My impression is Stephen refused to make O'Reilly's comment visible until he had a chance to insert his claims into its content. Seems odd that he'd edit the comment to include his responses when he wasn't doing so for other replies, and it really makes it difficult to follow O'Reilly's take on the events.
Further, one of the 9 comments which follow it, excluding Stephen's, would have made reference to it had it been visible since that time, right?