All the enterprise businesses in the US I worked with, and had to go through security audits, already banned the use of Kaspersky. Even for suppliers.
I guess this just makes it official.
1,226 karma · joined February 17, 2014
I guess this just makes it official.
There is TorchServe but I haven't used it so I'm not sure how production ready it is. You have Nvidia's triton server which support cpu and gpu with tf1,tf2,pytorch,onnx and tensorRT.
You have onnx runtime which can run on cpu and gpu and there are convertors from tf and pytorch to onnx.
Then you have cloud based solutions like AWS sagemaker, elastic inference endpoints and even Inf1 instances that use AWS Inferentia chips which you would run with the Neuron SDK, they even have TensorFlow serving containers with built it support for Inferentia.
End of the day it really depends on your model, size, latency, inference runtime and the cost obviously.
And that's before optimizations like FP16, BFLOAT16, TF32, INT8, pruning, layers rewrite, getting rid of batch normalization etc.
Then you have up and coming solutions like Neural Magic (not associated) deepsparse to create sparse models for inference.
And that's just for cloud if you are talking about edge ml it's even more down the rabbit hole..
Java 11 was released on 2018-09-25
Java 11.0.2 that contained the "fix" was released on 2019-01-15
Java 11.0.13 (latest) was released on 2021-10-19
Also Java 8u192 was released on 2018-10-16
If you are an enterprise company that runs 3 year old java version then
1) Your CSO and CIO should all be fired
2) Your security team should be replaced
3) Your ISO 27001 and SOC2 certification among others should be revoked
Java backward compatibility is really good, even better when it's on the same major I don't see why you shouldn't update. You have a docker image with java, just pull the base image before you build, you run it bare you/need to update the server packages periodically, better if you have unattended update setup (default in recent ubuntu versions tho might need a server restart for some to apply) It's not like between java updates there aren't any security fixes, there are so you should update.
Nevertheless other mitigations like not exposing internal services to the internet would have blocked these attempts.
If you already use docker containers it's a win win.
Now you get into the issues of tracing, request failures and retries, payload size (only json? really..) etc.
But I do agree that a super optimized sql for a a specific purpose has it's performance benefit
This could be their way to lower the amount of testing they have to do, but for a company the size of Microsoft that's inexcusable.
That fact the 7th gen Intel (like the 7700k that has TPM 2.0) or first gen Zen aren't supported is bad enough but that Microsoft is silent about it and even their PMs and Security employees on twitter just brush it off as "There are more requirements" is pure BS.
Hardware is fine but it's much more expensive than just building it yourself.
Fry : Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.
Futurama was so ahead of time it's scary.
It's not in the best interest of Amazon to fight this as long as it moves product and make them money, if they really cared they would create a system that detect this kind of behavior or just buy https://www.fakespot.com/
If they really cared they wouldn't allow someone to sell the same product manufactured en mass in china and just slaps some random name to be sold.
If they really cared they would "test" or validate products before they are listed on their platform.
This is called demand response programs and existed for years.
It's a way to shave the peak instead of building a new power station.
You usually get a notification in advance so you can opt out.
This is nothing new and existed in the past in some forms. There are also programs to remote control water heaters (to turn them on at night when demand is low) by having special circuitry in the electric box.
This will also be implemented more and extended as home EV charging stations pop up.
> Israel wanted the land but not its original population
It's probably true that the founders didn't want to control the Arab population (not out of racisms) but as it turns out they have 2 million Arab citizens. I do agree that a one state solution couldn't work now demographically as that would be an apartheid state.
> so you think that Jews now have a right to do the evil
Who is dehumanizing who now...
The point was the formation of Israel in 48, the parent talked about territories other than gaza and the west bank, It's just that it's disingenuous to pick on Israel at that time saying they are the baddies just because they won, they were fighting for survival and against the annihilation of the Jews in that region and that one of the reasons that this still an issue because unlike other countries Israel did not annihilate their enemies, if the Arabs won in 48 there wouldn't be a debate because all the Israeli Jews would be dead and the world would go on like it's another day and just mark it in the footnote of history as the 2nd Jewish holocaust and that's it.
I do think the west bank occupation is wrong and should be "solved" but it's far from evil because intent matters, why there is an occupation matters, they reasons behind Israel actions matter, actions Israel don't make as the occupying force matter.
But I'm closing this discussion because it leads to nowhere and the bots downvoting me within 1 minute of commenting needs a break, have a good day.
Ofc they would. So what? They weren't the rulers or had any form of government, most of the land didn't belong to them no matter how gerrymandering maps you want to draw. It was the British mandate before the ottoman before that.....
> mass migration of Jews there that displaced them
It didn't. The land Jews settled on was purchased since the 1880s.
A lot of those Palestinians were immigrants themselves who came to Palestine for work, and the Jewish population were the ones that hired them. Most of Palestine before the Jews started to immigrate and built was deserts and swamps, no one wanted to live there until the Jewish population terraformed them to be livable.
> Why is it that you think Palestinians only have the right to Gaza and the West Bank
Because they lost the war they started, you can't start a war lose and then cry that you lost territory. They didn't want a Jewish state at all, or be under Jewish rule.
That's how countries form, that's how borders are made. Every other country in the world was formed by conflict it's just that most of those countries annihilated the other side long ago so there is almost no one left to hear their voice or go on a twitter rampage.
We haven't, you didn't.
> when you cannot hit the army
They do but it's just easier to just cut a fence and stab children sleeping, that's not legitimate struggle that's barbarism and terrorisms.
> willing to use any means
That's exactly the point, when the end justify the means. What they do, how they operate that's evil. It has nothing to do with justice.
> your country had been invaded
The PLO was founded in 64 way before any occupation of the west bank and gaza so your point of fighting your oppressor is moot unless you consider the occupation the entire state of Israel then your legal argument is void.
They didn't struggle against their Egyptian and Jordanian "occupation" but when it's Jews, oy vey.
You want to struggle against oppressors, ok , I get that but when you say you want the utter annihilation and destruction of a racial group when you praise and actively work to bomb busses, stab people in the street and in their homes, when you dig tunnels to pop up in the Kibbutz dining room, when you blow incendiary balloons that destroy forests and nature reserves killing countless wild life you are not human, you are an evil daemon that should be eradicated just as was done with nazi Germany and ISIS.
It's their actions not just this document. It's the calling of Jihad that's not changed. Calling for the destruction of Israel that has not changed. If they wanted to "change", their action would reflect that, what you linked is just a lipstick on a pig to appeal to the westerns media and mind set to look more tolerant but they truly aren't.
If ISIS suddenly had a more "tolerant" charter and leadership would you change their mind about them?
Calling for the destruction of Israel isn't calling to kill the Jews?
Calling for Jihad against the Jews and quoting Islamic religious texts to provide justification for fighting against and killing the Jews isn't an incitement for genocide?
This reads just like mein kampf, if this was written by a white person you would call him a nazi.
How far in history do we need to go for context?
- 67 (6 day war)?
- 64 (PLO founding)
- 48 (Israel independence)?
- 1920 Nebi Musa riots, 1921 Jaffa riots, 1929 Palestine riots, 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine?
They don't preserver the existing state they plan to take over and rule from a far.
> Israel clashed with it to the point they began aiding Syrian rebels
Israel assisted the rebels by giving medical aid so they won't hurt the druze population in Syria because the druze in Israel are blood relatives and enlist in the Israeli military that's a far cry from suppling weapons and intel
> overwhelmingly in Israel's favour.
You still didn't explain how.
The Lebanese government let Hezbollah get the way it is by first allowing the PLO into south Lebanon bowing to Syria and having no backbone and shit military and now they suffer for it.
Do you think Israel was jealous of the Paris of the middle east and set up Hezbollah to take over?
> And? Not much has changed from that fact
Your whole argument was that Hezbollah is good for Israel, how thousands of rocket aiming at your population centers good for Israel? That's why what you wrote is bull.
1) Report on a minor issues in Israel 2) Make it "world news" 3) Escalate the tension 4) Rip those clicks.
Do you think reporting on some stone throwing or a house eviction should be the top headline in CNN? These don't remotely compare to what's going on in Africa, Yemen or east Ukraine.
Israel supports who is aligned with their regional objectives. Like when they supported Iran before the takeover. You work with what you got, there isn't big love between Israel and Egypt or Saudi Arabia and why single Israel? Everyone in the world has relationships with these 2 countries.
It's true that a strong Lebanon or Syria aren't in the best Interest of Israel military wise but at least there was someone in charge to keep the "peace" now it's chaos with Iranian backed groups working close to the border to destabilize it and Hezbollah has thousands of rockets pointing at Israel that's not in the best interest of Israel