TheAngush

Brian McElhaney and Nick Kocher, otherwise known as the off-and-on YouTube sketch duo BriTANicK, also have two comedy films that came out in April. One they wrote, the other they wrote & directed.

I have to look at it all day, so no. What would you call bad software? Bad code? Electron? None of that has any meaningful effect on my day to day experience as a user. But no matter what apps I'm using, Apple's terrible design decisions are ever-present. It's like having dirty glasses.

You left out IMO the biggest difference (and the only one I'd pay for): the Pro is the only iPad model with ProMotion (aka. 120Hz refresh rate).

Funky and weird JRPG titles and games with cartoony graphics and ridiculous titles are (a) a small percentage of the PlayStation library given that >99% of games are cross-platform, (b) not nearly global enough in their appeal or sales figures to make any disinterested persons the outliers, and (c) in my experience, many of them also release on Xbox, Switch, and/or PC.

I own no consoles and am neutral on JRPGs and cartoony graphics, so I have no skin in this game. But you seem oddly focused on writing off a functionally identical piece of hardware based on the existence of one particular genre that doesn't interest you.

Success is relative. The Steam Deck is only unsuccessful if you consider the goal of the device to be "outsell Nintendo". I would argue 4 million units is not merely a success, but a massive success.

Your second link appears to be about OwnCloud, not OwnCloud Infinite Scale.

You've overlooked a key element of my complaint: I'm a student. I have never been employed in any capacity. Thus, I have no information with which to trade.

But whether it's a dark pattern is not what makes this particular instance egregious in my mind. I find it egregious as it places me in a situation where I have to either lie by providing false information and misusing the platform, or make an uninformed decision I may not otherwise have made to consequences that could potentially have been avoided were the decision in fact informed.

Consider a workplace culture rife with harassment. That's a harmful situation to enter. Reading reviews of an employers workplace culture on a platform like GlassDoor isn't going to make it impossible to encounter such environments, but it will make it easier to avoid them. But I'm forbidden from doing so because I cannot trade for it. As I indicated in my original comment, the implication here is that I'm only entitled to seek safe work environments if I can afford to pay for the privilege.

Per their own About page:

> Every day, we’re inspired by a vision to make positive workplace change through radical transparency. Through the products we make and the communities we create, we’re breaking down barriers that lead to discrimination, pay gaps, and toxic work environments.

This tactic of demanding upfront payment (in the form of a review) is antithetical to their stated goal and philosophy. As a user I think my other complaints are fair, but my offense, as you say, comes from this.

I had an experience like this today when I tried to use GlassDoor for the first time. As a student making my first ever job applications, I wanted to see what salaries and work environments were like at particular employers.

GlassDoor did the same scroll-locking tactic (so an element zapper like Ublock Origin's wouldn't resolve the issue), instructing me to register or sign in to view any information. So I registered an account. Only, it still covered the screen and locked the scroll position, now telling me that I needed to leave a review for my current employer if I wanted to use the website for information gathering.

I find this particularly egregious, particularly for a company ostensibly founded around the notion of transparency and freedom of information (in regards to workplace compensation and culture). Evidently one is only entitled to make informed decisions after first experiencing the potential consequences of making uninformed decisions. Joyous.

Suffice to say I will not be using GlassDoor in the future.

If you replace JavaScript with CSS you aren't saving bandwidth; you're trading it.

In many scenarios I'd argue CSS would require more bandwidth. It can get quite verbose.

> They should repurpose `do` so that `do {}` (without the `while`) is an expression that you can put statements inside and return the last statement.

There's a proposal for precisely that. Unfortunately, only Stage 1 though.

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions

There's a distinction between user-friendly and you-friendly, regardless of your individual status as a user.

There's a spec proposal for precisely that. It's in Colour Level... 6, I believe? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value...

> I don’t see anything super impressive that could be attributed to CoD developers. I think most of this really advances in hardware that allows more lighting, higher quality textures and more polygons.

Who do you think is making the lighting, textures, and polygons? Who do you think is coding the engine for it?

Are you sure? It seems to work for me. MDN and caniuse agree: https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_aspect-ratio

Where are you getting that from? It seems to be fully supported: https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_aspect-ratio

I've been using if for months with no issues in cross-browser testing, and I haven't enabled any experimental flags.

What forums let you do that? Every forum I use (all based on Xenforo, admittedly) don't allow file uploads period, except for a small avatar. All other content must be embedded through external links. Which Discord also supports.

Not sure where the paywalling of forum features is happening there.

I notice it when interacting with my computer at all. Mouse movements, alt tabbing, system animations, (some) keyboard inputs. The content being viewed is irrelevant to me; 144 Hz improves my experience across the board.