41 karma · joined July 3, 2024
Even if you ignore the dip, it’s hard to call the situation “an all time high”. But maybe you have other sources ?
But I agree that, if it he had run, he would have win, as the NSDAP was the leading party in Reichstag at the time.
Do you have any source for that ? it would n’a quite helpful, honestly.
Second, I would say that the jury is still in debat for Bukele. Yes, it’s re-election is anti-constituai but he seems to still have the support of the population, as the election seemed to be fair and healthy.
But I agree that his legal shenningans to allow for his re-election don’t bode well for the future. Let’s wait and see.
I personnaly see the attacks against the judiciary of Brazil more troublesome that this move.
Because it’s not black and white
> Should X have to comply with every country's censorship requests?
X must comply with the laws of every country it’s operate. If it cannot, or not willing to do it, it must leave it. That’s exactly what Elon have done
> Elon alleged that Moraes requested private user information as well. Should X hand over any and all user data that governments ask for ?
If it’s done legally, yes.
This take is quite bizarre, honestly, given how personal data protection laws are subpar in the US. Even from the government (remember patriot act).
Hitler was named chancellor of the weimar republic by the government. Not elected as such.
And it was part of a plot from the weimar government to be able to continue to work without casting new elections, as asked by the laws.
In France, for exemple, you need first to have majority in both chambers (Senate and parliament) to validate the content of the modification. Then you need to have of 3/5 of parliament OR the majority in a referendum for apr roving the modification and putting it in the constitution.
And for almost every healthy constitutional democracy, it the same order of difficulty.
Practically, this would never happen, Estonia is too small of an actor.
But if the EU decided to pass a law in this sense (would not happen, too many people implicated in an EU law writing), this would have more weight.
And generally, it came with a slap of the wrist, and the company put up the banner.
For a site to be blocked, it need repeatable, multiple and not correctibles infractions.
I call counter-bullshit. Provide some source with numbers.
And calling Alende a dictator need some Shutzpah. On this point, I think we would have to stop at the « agree to disagree » level.
Also, when he is named chancellor, it’s been a while since the democratic value of weimar were hurting. Paul Von Hindenburg started as soon as 1930 to govern through executive act, ignoring and/or strong arming the Reichstag. Not really what I would call a healthy democratic government.
Also, Hitler was named as chancellor through a plot of the current weimar government to avoid calling new elections, like the laws said they must.
Also the company could be asked to forbid EU customer to access the product. Wouldn’t be a big threat but it would prevent the company to do any futur business in Europe.
Tech savvy customer could still access the product but that is not a market as big as every EU potential customer.
Two exemple which are frequently used as exemple are Italy and Germany in the 1930´s but neither Hitler nor Mussolini came in power through the election, but by strong arming the power in place, and after that (at least for Germany) use the excuse of rigged election to validate their power.
I would welcome any elements which would invalidate my (quite incomplete, I recon) perception of the situation.